IBMR ranks 3rd of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMR vs MUNG
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMR 529.9×the volume
105K199
IBMR vs MUNG Performance
+2.0%+3.7%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- MUNG 0.18%
- IBMR $527M
- MUNG $10M
- IBMR +1.6%
- MUNG
- IBMR 2.54%
- MUNG
- IBMR 2071
- MUNG 183
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- MUNG 199 sh
- IBMR $25.16
- MUNG $99.34
ETF.net Grade
- —MUNGNot yet graded
| Pillar | IBMR | MUNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | C54 | |
| Tradability | A83 | |
| Holdings | A89 | |
| Durability | A85 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Our read on each fund
IBMRA
MUNG—
In short
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMR vs MUNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMR vs MUNG Cost
Overpaying MUNG vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
MUNG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMR | MUNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNG
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
MUNG 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMR vs MUNG Dividends
- IBMR 2.54%
- MUNG
- IBMR $0.64
- MUNG
- IBMR $0.05
- MUNG $0.32
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- MUNG Oct 1, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- MUNG Oct 7, 2026
- IBMR Monthly
- MUNG Irregular
Distribution history
IBMR vs MUNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMR 4.4%MUNG
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMR 0.02MUNG
- Worst fall
- IBMR −4.8%MUNG
- Market sensitivity
- IBMR 0.75MUNG 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.