IBMR ranks 3rd and MUNA 12th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMR vs MUNA
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMR 60.2×the volume
109K1.82K
IBMR vs MUNA Performance
+2.0%+2.5%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- MUNA 0.18%
- IBMR $535M
- MUNA $8M
- IBMR +2.0%
- MUNA +2.5%, better
- IBMR 2.53%, better
- MUNA 2.28%
- IBMR 2087
- MUNA 228
- IBMR 109K sh, better
- MUNA 1.82K sh
- IBMR $25.18
- MUNA $99.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMR | MUNA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A96Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C48 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D31 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMR and MUNA are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMRA
MUNAB
In short
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
MUNA Most target-maturity bond funds are a single rung. MUNA is the whole staircase: an actively managed muni ladder with rungs maturing each year through 2030 that pays principal back as it goes, then liquidates in the terminal year.
Stated mandate
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
MUNA The Fund seeks periodic distributions of federally tax-exempt income and/or principal through 2030. It uses a laddered municipal-bond strategy with maturities across annual rungs through the terminal year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMR vs MUNA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMR vs MUNA Cost
Overpaying MUNA vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
MUNA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMR | MUNA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNA
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
MUNA 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMR vs MUNA Dividends
- IBMR 2.53%, better
- MUNA 2.28%
- IBMR $0.64
- MUNA $2.28
- IBMR $0.05
- MUNA $0.22
- IBMR Nov 2, 2026
- MUNA Nov 2, 2026
- IBMR Nov 5, 2026
- MUNA Nov 6, 2026
- IBMR Monthly
- MUNA Monthly
Distribution history
IBMR vs MUNA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMR 4.4%MUNA 2.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMR 0.02MUNA −0.65
- Worst fall
- IBMR −4.8%MUNA −2.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMR 0.75MUNA 0.04
IBMR and MUNA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
