IBMP ranks 1st and MUNA 12th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMP vs MUNA
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMP 62.0×the volume
112K1.82K
IBMP vs MUNA Performance
+2.3%+2.5%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- MUNA 0.18%
- IBMP $684M
- MUNA $8M
- IBMP +2.3%
- MUNA +2.5%, better
- IBMP 2.55%, better
- MUNA 2.28%
- IBMP 1857
- MUNA 228
- IBMP 112K sh, better
- MUNA 1.82K sh
- IBMP $25.32
- MUNA $99.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMP | MUNA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B59 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A94Higher | D31 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMP and MUNA are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMPA
MUNAB
In short
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
MUNA Most target-maturity bond funds are a single rung. MUNA is the whole staircase: an actively managed muni ladder with rungs maturing each year through 2030 that pays principal back as it goes, then liquidates in the terminal year.
Stated mandate
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
MUNA The Fund seeks periodic distributions of federally tax-exempt income and/or principal through 2030. It uses a laddered municipal-bond strategy with maturities across annual rungs through the terminal year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMP vs MUNA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMP vs MUNA Cost
Overpaying MUNA vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
MUNA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMP | MUNA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNA
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
MUNA 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMP vs MUNA Dividends
- IBMP 2.55%, better
- MUNA 2.28%
- IBMP $0.65
- MUNA $2.28
- IBMP $0.06
- MUNA $0.22
- IBMP Nov 2, 2026
- MUNA Nov 2, 2026
- IBMP Nov 5, 2026
- MUNA Nov 6, 2026
- IBMP Monthly
- MUNA Monthly
Distribution history
IBMP vs MUNA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMP 2.3%MUNA 2.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMP −0.33MUNA −0.65
- Worst fall
- IBMP −9.4%MUNA −2.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMP 0.40MUNA 0.04
IBMP and MUNA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
