IBMR ranks 3rd and MUND 21st of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMR vs MUND
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMR 62.8×the volume
109K1.74K
IBMR vs MUND Performance
+2.0%+2.2%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- MUND 0.18%
- IBMR $535M
- MUND $10M
- IBMR +2.0%
- MUND +2.2%, better
- IBMR 2.53%
- MUND 3.61%, better
- IBMR 2087
- MUND 190
- IBMR 109K sh, better
- MUND 1.74K sh
- IBMR $25.18
- MUND $101.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMR | MUND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | C48Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | B56 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D37 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMR and MUND are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMRA
MUNDC
In short
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
MUND A municipal bond ladder in one ticket: bonds maturing on a schedule through 2055, federally tax-exempt income paid monthly, and principal handed back as rungs mature. Built to wind down by its terminal year, not run forever.
Stated mandate
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
MUND The Fund seeks periodic distributions of federally tax-exempt income and/or principal through 2055. It uses a laddered strategy investing in municipal debt instruments with different maturity dates through the 2055 terminal year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMR vs MUND Holdings
How IBMR and MUND differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
IBMR and MUND share no Sector name, so they cannot be compared by Sector.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBMRMore in MUND | Gap | IBMR | MUND |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- IBMR5.1%
- MUND16.6%
- IBMR1,334
- MUND165
Asset class
- IBMR
- Bonds
- MUND
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. IBMR holds 1,334 securities, MUND 165.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMR vs MUND Cost
Overpaying MUND vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
MUND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMR | MUND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- 0.18%MUND
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
MUND 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMR vs MUND Dividends
- IBMR 2.53%
- MUND 3.61%, better
- IBMR $0.64
- MUND $3.67
- IBMR $0.05
- MUND $0.28
- IBMR Nov 2, 2026
- MUND Nov 2, 2026
- IBMR Nov 5, 2026
- MUND Nov 6, 2026
- IBMR Monthly
- MUND Monthly
Distribution history
IBMR vs MUND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMR 4.4%MUND 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMR 0.02MUND 0.05
- Worst fall
- IBMR −4.8%MUND −8.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMR 0.75MUND 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.