IBMP ranks 1st and MUND 21st of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMP vs MUND
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMP 64.7×the volume
112K1.74K
IBMP vs MUND Performance
+2.3%+2.2%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- MUND 0.18%
- IBMP $684M
- MUND $10M
- IBMP +2.3%, better
- MUND +2.2%
- IBMP 2.55%
- MUND 3.61%, better
- IBMP 1857
- MUND 190
- IBMP 112K sh, better
- MUND 1.74K sh
- IBMP $25.32
- MUND $101.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMP | MUND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B59Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | B56 |
| Durability | A94Higher | D37 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMP and MUND are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMPA
MUNDC
In short
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
MUND A municipal bond ladder in one ticket: bonds maturing on a schedule through 2055, federally tax-exempt income paid monthly, and principal handed back as rungs mature. Built to wind down by its terminal year, not run forever.
Stated mandate
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
MUND The Fund seeks periodic distributions of federally tax-exempt income and/or principal through 2055. It uses a laddered strategy investing in municipal debt instruments with different maturity dates through the 2055 terminal year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMP vs MUND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMP vs MUND Cost
Overpaying MUND vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
MUND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMP | MUND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- 0.18%MUND
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
MUND 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMP vs MUND Dividends
- IBMP 2.55%
- MUND 3.61%, better
- IBMP $0.65
- MUND $3.67
- IBMP $0.06
- MUND $0.28
- IBMP Nov 2, 2026
- MUND Nov 2, 2026
- IBMP Nov 5, 2026
- MUND Nov 6, 2026
- IBMP Monthly
- MUND Monthly
Distribution history
IBMP vs MUND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMP 2.3%MUND 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMP −0.33MUND 0.05
- Worst fall
- IBMP −9.4%MUND −8.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMP 0.40MUND 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.