Skip to content

ICOP vs PWRD

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

ICOPBNasdaq

TCW Transform Systems ETF

PWRDCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ICOP −0.28pt a year

ICOP0.47%PWRD0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOP 1.02×the volume

ICOP97.5KPWRD95.4K

3Y return · a year

ICOP +7.0pt

ICOP+32.0%PWRD+25.0%

ICOP vs PWRD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.6%ICOP−4.6%PWRD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ICOP +23.6%. PWRD −4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ICOP 0.47%, better
PWRD 0.75%
Fund size
ICOP $408M
PWRD $1.42B
1Y total return
ICOP +23.6%, better
PWRD −4.6%
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
PWRD 0.06%
Holdings
ICOP 78
PWRD 29
Avg volume (30D)
ICOP 97.5K sh, better
PWRD 95.4K sh
NAV per share
ICOP $46.95
PWRD $97.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ICOP: Cost 83, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 44, Durability 78. PWRD: Cost 19, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 49, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for ICOP, PWRD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarICOPPWRD
Cost30% weightA83HigherF19
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40C49Higher
Tradability15% weightA81A89Higher
Holdings10% weightC44C49Higher
Durability5% weightA78HigherA76

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ICOP and PWRD are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ICOP ranks 4th and PWRD 9th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BHAILState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 8CCOPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 9CPWRDTCW Transform Systems ETFScore 46
  8. Rank 9CTINYProShares Nanotechnology ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ICOPBiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

PWRDCTCW Transform Systems ETF

In short

ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.

PWRD A concentrated global bet on the machinery of energy: roughly 30 companies tied to how the world sources, produces and consumes power. Broader than a solar index, and far narrower than a sector fund.

Stated mandate

ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.

PWRD The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies expected to benefit from worldwide changes in the systems used to source, produce, and consume energy and power.

Why people hold it

  • ICOP At 0.47% a year it is the cheapest fund in the copper-mining cohort, undercutting COPX (0.65%), COPP (0.66%), COPJ (0.75%) and KCOP (0.99%), and sitting below the group's 0.66% median.
  • A rules-based pure play: it follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, holding companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining. Miners' shares, not copper futures, and no stock-picking.ishares.com
  • Global by mandate, not by accident: the index reaches U.S. and non-U.S. miners, which is where much of the world's copper actually trades. Distributions are paid quarterly.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger builds in a small copper-mining field, pairing the lowest fee in the group with a mainstream iShares index wrapper.
  • PWRD One idea, roughly 30 stocks, worldwide. The mandate covers the whole chain (sourcing, production, consumption), so it reaches well beyond power generators.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades at moderate volume: unusual heft for a single-theme portfolio this narrow.
  • Trading since 2022, so there is a multi-year live record to judge instead of a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • ICOP Non-diversified by design: a few dozen miners levered to one metal, with the largest names carrying a big slice. Copper prices and mine-level news drive the ride.ishares.com
  • A large share of the basket is listed outside the U.S., so currency moves and foreign market risks come along with the copper exposure.ishares.com
  • It launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and trading is moderate rather than heavy. Limit orders earn their keep on bigger tickets.
  • PWRD At 0.75% a year, it costs more than the typical global thematic ETF. Cheaper options sit in the same group, including KLMT at 0.10% and IQSZ at 0.19%.
  • With roughly 30 holdings, a handful of names steer the outcome, and a single-theme portfolio can look nothing like a broad global index.
  • Payouts come once or twice a year. The stated goal is long-term capital growth, not income.

Full ICOP profile⁠

Full PWRD profile⁠

ICOP vs PWRD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ICOP vs PWRD Cost

Overpaying PWRD vs ICOP

$5,064

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ICOP 0.47%

    $9,418

  • PWRD 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ICOP 0.47%
  • PWRD 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PWRD $14,482ICOP $9,418

Year by year

YearICOPPWRDOverpaying
10$847$1,336$489
20$3,261$5,078$1,817
30$9,418$14,482$5,064

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
  • 0.75%PWRD
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds

PWRD 14th cheapest of 18 funds

ICOP vs PWRD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
PWRD 0.06%
Payout (12M)
ICOP $0.89
PWRD $0.06
Last payment
ICOP $0.27
PWRD $0.06
Ex-dividend
ICOP Jun 15, 2026
PWRD Jun 23, 2026
Paid on
ICOP Jun 18, 2026
PWRD Jun 25, 2026
Frequency
ICOP Twice a year
PWRD Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ICOPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll ICOP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.05; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Jun 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.59; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Jun 15, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PWRDAnnual · 15 paymentsAll PWRD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2022 $0.04; Jun 21, 2022 $0.14; Sep 20, 2022 $0.13; Dec 20, 2022 $0.12; Mar 21, 2023 $0.04; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 19, 2023 $0.06; Dec 19, 2023 $0.15; Mar 18, 2024 $0.04; Jun 24, 2024 $0.19; Sep 23, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.07; Mar 24, 2025 $0.04; Jun 23, 2025 $0.17; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ICOP vs PWRD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ICOP 30.3%PWRD 22.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ICOP 0.93, betterPWRD 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ICOP −38.6%since Jun 2023PWRD −25.9%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ICOP 1.34PWRD 1.19

Popular comparisons

  • ICOPBvsFITEA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWRDCvsFITEA

    TCW Transform Systems ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsAGNGA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWRDCvsAGNGA

    TCW Transform Systems ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsWRNDB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWRDCvsWRNDB

    TCW Transform Systems ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.