ICOP ranks 4th and PWRD 9th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
ICOP vs PWRD
ICOP −0.28pt a year
0.47%0.75%
ICOP 1.02×the volume
97.5K95.4K
ICOP +7.0pt
+32.0%+25.0%
ICOP vs PWRD Performance
+23.6%−4.6%
- ICOP 0.47%, better
- PWRD 0.75%
- ICOP $408M
- PWRD $1.42B
- ICOP +23.6%, better
- PWRD −4.6%
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- PWRD 0.06%
- ICOP 78
- PWRD 29
- ICOP 97.5K sh, better
- PWRD 95.4K sh
- ICOP $46.95
- PWRD $97.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICOP | PWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F19 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | A81 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | C49Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | A76 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. ICOP and PWRD are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICOPB
PWRDC
In short
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
PWRD A concentrated global bet on the machinery of energy: roughly 30 companies tied to how the world sources, produces and consumes power. Broader than a solar index, and far narrower than a sector fund.
Stated mandate
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
PWRD The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies expected to benefit from worldwide changes in the systems used to source, produce, and consume energy and power.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICOP vs PWRD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICOP vs PWRD Cost
Overpaying PWRD vs ICOP
$5,064
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
PWRD 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICOP | PWRD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,336 | $489 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $5,078 | $1,817 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $14,482 | $5,064 |
- 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
- 0.75%PWRD
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
PWRD 14th cheapest of 18 funds
ICOP vs PWRD Dividends
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- PWRD 0.06%
- ICOP $0.89
- PWRD $0.06
- ICOP $0.27
- PWRD $0.06
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- PWRD Jun 23, 2026
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- PWRD Jun 25, 2026
- ICOP Twice a year
- PWRD Annual
Distribution history
ICOP vs PWRD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICOP 30.3%PWRD 22.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ICOP 0.93, betterPWRD 0.91
- Worst fall
- ICOP −38.6%PWRD −25.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ICOP 1.34PWRD 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.