Skip to content

ICOW vs VDV

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF

ICOWCCboe

Vanguard Developed Markets Ex-US Value Index ETF

VDVBCboe

Overlap

12.1%by weight

Expense ratio

VDV −0.57pt a year

ICOW0.65%VDV0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOW 16.4×the volume

ICOW135KVDV8.24K

ICOW vs VDV Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−1.0%ICOW−2.0%VDV

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. ICOW −1.0%. VDV −2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%0%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ICOW 0.65%
VDV 0.08%, better
Fund size
ICOW $1.76B
VDV $46M
1Y total return
ICOW +20.9%
VDV No data
Yield (12M)
ICOW 3.96%
VDV No data
Holdings
ICOW 106
VDV 758
Avg volume (30D)
ICOW 135K sh, better
VDV 8.24K sh
NAV per share
ICOW $42.81
VDV $74.67
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ICOW: Cost 3, Risk 56, Mission 88, Tradability 70, Holdings 39, Durability 53. VDV: Cost 97, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 19, Holdings 77, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for ICOW, VDV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarICOWVDV
Cost30% weightF3A97Higher
Mission25% weightA88Not scored
Risk15% weightB56B59Higher
Tradability15% weightA70HigherF19
Holdings10% weightD39A77Higher
Durability5% weightC53HigherF21

Rank among International Value Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ICOW and VDV are both graded against the same 12 International Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Value Index⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

VDV ranks 3rd and ICOW 9th of 12 funds in the International Value Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ADFIVDimensional International Value ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BEFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BVDVVanguard Developed Markets Ex-US Value Index ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BEWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 8BIVLUiShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 9CICOWPacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 10CAVNVAvantis All International Markets Value ETF 9Score 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ICOWCPacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF

VDVBVanguard Developed Markets Ex-US Value Index ETF

In short

ICOW Cash flow is the yardstick here, not book value. ICOW screens the FTSE Developed ex-US index and holds the 100 companies with the highest free-cash-flow yield: international value measured by money that actually landed.

VDV No data

Stated mandate

ICOW The fund seeks capital appreciation through a rules-based screen of the FTSE Developed ex-US Index that selects 100 international companies based on free-cash-flow yield.

VDV No data

Why people hold it

  • ICOW One rule, no drift: rank developed ex-US companies on free-cash-flow yield, keep the top 100. The screen is mechanical, so no manager talks themselves into a story stock.paceretfs.com
  • Cash generation is harder to dress up than a low price-to-book, so the portfolio leans value and quality from the same screen.
  • Running since 2017, now a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate trading volume that distributes quarterly.

VDV No data

Worth knowing

  • ICOW At 0.65% a year it costs roughly double the international-value median, and cheaper broad options sit in the same aisle (DFIV 0.27%, EFV 0.31%).
  • About 110 holdings, so single names and sectors carry more weight than in a broad international value index.
  • Against its international-value peers it lands in the lower half overall, with fee and portfolio breadth doing most of the work.

VDV No data

Full ICOW profile⁠

Full VDV profile⁠

ICOW vs VDV Holdings

How ICOW and VDV differ

Overlap by weight

12.1%

Shared holdings make up 76.9% of ICOW and 12.1% of VDV.

Level by level

  • Holdings65 in both12.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors67.2%
  • Countryby domicile80.4%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in ICOW and VDV, widest gap first
SectorMore in ICOWMore in VDVGap
FinancialsVDV +23.4 points
IndustrialsICOW +9.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryICOW +8.1 points
CommunicationICOW +8.0 points
UtilitiesVDV +4.8 points
EnergyICOW +3.6 points
Real EstateVDV +2.6 points
TechnologyVDV +2.0 points
Health CareICOW +1.8 points
Consumer StaplesICOW +1.4 points
MaterialsICOW +0.8 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ICOW and VDV, widest gap first
CountryMore in ICOWMore in VDVGap
FranceICOW +6.4 points
SwitzerlandVDV +4.4 points
South KoreaVDV +4.3 points
AustraliaVDV +3.9 points
United KingdomICOW +3.0 points
ItalyVDV +2.7 points
Hong KongICOW +2.2 points
SwedenICOW +1.2 points
Other countries (20)ICOW +2.5 points

Outside the US: ICOW 93% developed, 7% emerging. VDV 89% developed, 11% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ICOW22.5%
  • VDV15.4%

Securities held

  • ICOW100
  • VDV744

Asset class

ICOW
Stocks
VDV
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in ICOW35
  • In both65
  • Only in VDV679

Only in ICOW

35 securities, 22.7% of ICOW by weight

  • Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd2.34%
  • Ryanair Holdings PLC1.14%
  • Kinross Gold Corp1.14%

Only in VDV

679 securities, 88.0% of VDV by weight

  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd4.12%
  • Nestle SA1.82%
  • Toyota Motor Corp1.69%

Weight gaps

All 65 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ICOW and VDV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ICOWMore in VDVGap
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co LtdICOW +2.21 points
LY CorpICOW +2.09 points
DHL GroupICOW +1.91 points
CK Hutchison Holdings LtdICOW +1.86 points
Vodafone Group PLCVOD.LICOW +1.86 points
Swisscom AGICOW +1.74 points
Sony Group CorpICOW +1.74 points
KDDI CorpICOW +1.73 points

All 109 ICOW holdings⁠All 738 VDV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ICOW vs VDV Cost

Overpaying ICOW vs VDV

$11,028

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ICOW 0.65%

    $12,717

  • VDV 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ICOW 0.65%
  • VDV 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ICOW $12,717VDV $1,689

Year by year

YearICOWVDVOverpaying
10$1,163$147$1,016
20$4,440$575$3,865
30$12,717$1,689$11,028

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%ICOW
  • 0.08%VDV, cheaper
  • Middle half of International Value Index funds
  • Median 0.31%

VDV cheapest of 12 funds

ICOW 12th cheapest of 12 funds

ICOW vs VDV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ICOW 3.96%
VDV No data
Payout (12M)
ICOW $1.73
VDV No data
Last payment
ICOW $0.94
VDV $0.49
Ex-dividend
ICOW Sep 3, 2026
VDV Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ICOW Sep 8, 2026
VDV Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
ICOW Quarterly
VDV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ICOWQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll ICOW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 26, 2017 $0.10; Dec 27, 2017 $0.14; Mar 27, 2018 $0.07; Jun 26, 2018 $0.18; Sep 25, 2018 $0.17; Dec 24, 2018 $0.21; Mar 26, 2019 $0.11; Jun 25, 2019 $0.19; Sep 24, 2019 $0.34; Dec 24, 2019 $0.20; Mar 23, 2020 $0.04; Jun 22, 2020 $0.09; Sep 21, 2020 $0.32; Dec 21, 2020 $0.24; Mar 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.18; Sep 23, 2021 $0.34; Dec 23, 2021 $0.12; Mar 24, 2022 $0.24; Jun 23, 2022 $0.30; Sep 22, 2022 $0.54; Dec 22, 2022 $0.36; Mar 23, 2023 $0.03; Jun 22, 2023 $0.37; Sep 21, 2023 $0.47; Dec 27, 2023 $0.26; Mar 21, 2024 $0.06; Jun 27, 2024 $0.97; Sep 26, 2024 $0.15; Dec 27, 2024 $0.10; Mar 6, 2025 $0.25; Jun 5, 2025 $0.24; Sep 4, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.50; Mar 5, 2026 $0.04; Jun 4, 2026 $0.26; Sep 3, 2026 $0.94. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VDVQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll VDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 18, 2026 $0.61; Sep 18, 2026 $0.49. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

ICOW vs VDV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ICOW 12.6%VDV No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ICOW 1.06VDV No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ICOW −27.8%VDV No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ICOW 0.75VDV 0.77

Popular comparisons

  • ICOWCvsDFIVA

    Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF · Dimensional International Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.27%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VDVBvsDFIVA

    Vanguard Developed Markets Ex-US Value Index ETF · Dimensional International Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.27%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOWCvsEFVB

    Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF · iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.31%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VDVBvsEFVB

    Vanguard Developed Markets Ex-US Value Index ETF · iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.31%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOWCvsEWJVB

    Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VDVBvsEWJVB

    Vanguard Developed Markets Ex-US Value Index ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.