ICSH ranks 1st and MINT 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs MINT
ICSH −0.28pt a year
0.08%0.36%
MINT 1.2×the volume
1.64M1.89M
ICSH +0.1pt
+2.9%+2.8%
ICSH vs MINT Performance
+21.3%+20.6%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- MINT 0.36%
- ICSH $8.97B
- MINT $18.3B
- ICSH +3.6%
- MINT +4.2%, better
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- MINT 4.08%
- ICSH 408
- MINT 1076
- ICSH 1.64M sh
- MINT 1.89M sh, better
- ICSH $50.47
- MINT $100.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A76 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A95Higher | A91 |
| Durability | A90Higher | A88 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and MINT are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
MINTB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
MINT PIMCO's parking spot for cash, running since 2009: an active ultra-short bond portfolio of roughly 800 positions built around current income, capital preservation and daily liquidity, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
MINT The Fund seeks maximum current income while emphasizing capital preservation and daily liquidity and applying PIMCO’s ESG investment strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs MINT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs MINT Cost
Overpaying MINT vs ICSH
$5,631
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
MINT 0.36%
$7,320
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | MINT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $652 | $505 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,522 | $1,947 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,320 | $5,631 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.36%MINT
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
MINT 74th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs MINT Dividends
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- MINT 4.08%
- ICSH $2.08
- MINT $4.11
- ICSH $0.17
- MINT $0.33
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- MINT Oct 1, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- MINT Oct 5, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- MINT Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs MINT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ICSH
- MINT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%MINT 0.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87MINT 1.69, better
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%, betterMINT −2.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04MINT 0.02
ICSH and MINT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
