TBLL ranks 4th and MINT 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
MINT vs TBLL
TBLL −0.28pt a year
0.36%0.08%
MINT 6.0×the volume
1.89M313K
MINT +0.1pt
+3.8%+3.7%
MINT vs TBLL Performance
+20.6%+19.7%
- MINT 0.36%
- TBLL 0.08%, better
- MINT $18.3B
- TBLL $2.9B
- MINT +4.2%, better
- TBLL +3.6%
- MINT 4.08%, better
- TBLL 3.59%
- MINT 1076
- TBLL 90
- MINT 1.89M sh, better
- TBLL 313K sh
- MINT $100.70
- TBLL $105.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MINT | TBLL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A80 | A80 |
| Holdings | A91Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A88Higher | A80 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. MINT and TBLL are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MINTB
TBLLA
In short
MINT PIMCO's parking spot for cash, running since 2009: an active ultra-short bond portfolio of roughly 800 positions built around current income, capital preservation and daily liquidity, paying out monthly.
TBLL The bill fund that stretches to a full year. TBLL owns U.S. Treasuries maturing in one year or less and charges 0.08%, well under the typical fund in its 0-1 year Treasury group.
Stated mandate
MINT The Fund seeks maximum current income while emphasizing capital preservation and daily liquidity and applying PIMCO’s ESG investment strategy.
TBLL The fund invests primarily in U.S. Treasury obligations with maturities of one year or less and seeks exposure to the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MINT vs TBLL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MINT vs TBLL Cost
Overpaying MINT vs TBLL
$5,631
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MINT 0.36%
$7,320
TBLL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MINT | TBLL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $147 | $505 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $575 | $1,947 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $1,689 | $5,631 |
- 0.36%MINT
- 0.08%TBLL, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
TBLL 10th cheapest of 78 funds
MINT 74th cheapest of 78 funds
MINT vs TBLL Dividends
- MINT 4.08%, better
- TBLL 3.59%
- MINT $4.11
- TBLL $3.79
- MINT $0.33
- TBLL $0.34
- MINT Oct 1, 2026
- TBLL Oct 19, 2026
- MINT Oct 5, 2026
- TBLL Oct 23, 2026
- MINT Monthly
- TBLL Monthly
Distribution history
MINT vs TBLL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MINT
- TBLL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MINT 0.4%TBLL 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MINT 1.69, betterTBLL −0.66
- Worst fall
- MINT −2.3%TBLL −0.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MINT 0.02TBLL 0.01
MINT and TBLL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
