VUSB ranks 3rd and MINT 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
MINT vs VUSB
VUSB −0.26pt a year
0.36%0.10%
VUSB 1.04×the volume
1.89M1.97M
MINT +0.1pt
+3.8%+3.7%
MINT vs VUSB Performance
+20.6%+20.0%
- MINT 0.36%
- VUSB 0.10%, better
- MINT $18.3B
- VUSB $9.9B
- MINT +4.2%, better
- VUSB +3.7%
- MINT 4.08%
- VUSB 4.27%, better
- MINT 1076
- VUSB 1348
- MINT 1.89M sh
- VUSB 1.97M sh, better
- MINT $100.70
- VUSB $49.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MINT | VUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | A91Higher | A90 |
| Durability | A88 | A89Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. MINT and VUSB are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MINTB
VUSBA
In short
MINT PIMCO's parking spot for cash, running since 2009: an active ultra-short bond portfolio of roughly 800 positions built around current income, capital preservation and daily liquidity, paying out monthly.
VUSB Vanguard's first actively managed bond ETF, run by its in-house fixed income team and priced at 0.10%. It holds investment-grade paper maturing inside two years: a step past a money fund, well short of a real bond fund.
Stated mandate
MINT The Fund seeks maximum current income while emphasizing capital preservation and daily liquidity and applying PIMCO’s ESG investment strategy.
VUSB The fund seeks current income with limited price volatility while investing in diversified high- and medium-quality fixed-income securities. It expects to maintain a dollar-weighted average maturity of 0–2 years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MINT vs VUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MINT vs VUSB Cost
Overpaying MINT vs VUSB
$5,214
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MINT 0.36%
$7,320
VUSB 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MINT | VUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $183 | $469 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $717 | $1,805 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $2,106 | $5,214 |
- 0.36%MINT
- 0.10%VUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
VUSB 13th cheapest of 78 funds
MINT 74th cheapest of 78 funds
MINT vs VUSB Dividends
- MINT 4.08%
- VUSB 4.27%, better
- MINT $4.11
- VUSB $2.12
- MINT $0.33
- VUSB $0.18
- MINT Oct 1, 2026
- VUSB Oct 1, 2026
- MINT Oct 5, 2026
- VUSB Oct 5, 2026
- MINT Monthly
- VUSB Monthly
Distribution history
MINT vs VUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MINT
- VUSB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MINT 0.4%, betterVUSB 0.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- MINT 1.69, betterVUSB 0.86
- Worst fall
- MINT −2.3%VUSB −1.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MINT 0.02VUSB 0.10
MINT and VUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
