XBI ranks 1st and IDNA 8th of 17 funds in the Biotech & Genomics Category.
IDNA vs XBI
XBI −0.12pt a year
0.47%0.35%
XBI 73.8×the volume
121K8.95M
XBI +6.7pt
−2.0%+4.7%
IDNA vs XBI Performance
−9.7%+25.8%
- IDNA 0.47%
- XBI 0.35%, better
- IDNA $335M
- XBI $10.8B
- IDNA +70.3%, better
- XBI +39.0%
- IDNA 0.66%, better
- XBI 0.35%
- IDNA 61
- XBI 164
- IDNA 121K sh
- XBI 8.95M sh, better
- IDNA $42.66
- XBI $157.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IDNA | XBI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C50 | A99Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | A88Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A89Higher |
Rank among Biotech & Genomics funds
Same Category. IDNA and XBI are both graded against the same 17 Biotech & Genomics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IDNAB
XBIA
In short
IDNA Most biotech ETFs hand you the US biotech index. IDNA goes narrower and wider at once: about 50 companies from developed and emerging markets, picked around genomics, immunology and bioengineering.
XBI Biotech's great leveler. Its index weights roughly 160 US biotechs near-equally, so a clinical-stage minnow carries about as much as a megacap. Live since 2006 and one of the most heavily traded funds in the sector.
Stated mandate
IDNA The Fund seeks to track an index of developed- and emerging-market companies positioned to benefit from long-term growth and innovation in genomics, immunology, and bioengineering.
XBI The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IDNA vs XBI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IDNA vs XBI Cost
Overpaying IDNA vs XBI
$2,292
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IDNA 0.47%
$9,418
XBI 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IDNA | XBI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $634 | $213 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $2,454 | $807 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $7,126 | $2,292 |
- 0.47%IDNA
- 0.35%XBI, cheaper
- Middle half of Biotech & Genomics funds
- Median 0.47%
XBI 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
IDNA 8th cheapest of 17 funds
IDNA vs XBI Dividends
- IDNA 0.66%, better
- XBI 0.35%
- IDNA $0.28
- XBI $0.54
- IDNA $0.13
- XBI $0.14
- IDNA Jun 15, 2026
- XBI Jun 22, 2026
- IDNA Jun 18, 2026
- XBI Jun 24, 2026
- IDNA Twice a year
- XBI Twice a year
Distribution history
IDNA vs XBI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IDNA
- XBI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IDNA 23.6%, betterXBI 24.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IDNA 1.20, betterXBI 1.11
- Worst fall
- IDNA −65.7%XBI −53.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IDNA 1.11XBI 1.10
IDNA and XBI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





