IFRA ranks 1st and SIMS 11th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IFRA vs SIMS
IFRA −0.15pt a year
0.30%0.45%
IFRA 626.2×the volume
398K635
IFRA +12.5pt
+12.2%−0.3%
IFRA vs SIMS Performance
+77.5%−1.5%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- SIMS 0.45%
- IFRA $4.07B
- SIMS $8M
- IFRA +12.7%, better
- SIMS −5.9%
- IFRA 1.74%, better
- SIMS 0.57%
- IFRA 165
- SIMS 55
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- SIMS 635 sh
- IFRA $58.33
- SIMS $44.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFRA | SIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A74 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A80 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B56 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IFRA and SIMS are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFRAA
SIMSB
In short
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
SIMS Most infrastructure funds own the concrete and the toll booths. SIMS tracks an S&P Kensho index built around the smart version of that buildout, roughly 50 stocks at 0.45% a year.
Stated mandate
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
SIMS The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFRA vs SIMS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFRA vs SIMS Cost
Overpaying SIMS vs IFRA
$2,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
SIMS 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFRA | SIMS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $812 | $267 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,128 | $1,015 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,041 | $2,892 |
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- 0.45%SIMS
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
SIMS 7th cheapest of 33 funds
IFRA vs SIMS Dividends
- IFRA 1.74%, better
- SIMS 0.57%
- IFRA $1.02
- SIMS $0.25
- IFRA $0.26
- SIMS $0.05
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- SIMS Sep 21, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- SIMS Sep 23, 2026
- IFRA Quarterly
- SIMS Quarterly
Distribution history
IFRA vs SIMS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFRA
- SIMS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFRA 17.2%, betterSIMS 21.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IFRA 0.92, betterSIMS 0.62
- Worst fall
- IFRA −19.9%, betterSIMS −44.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IFRA 0.96SIMS 1.32
IFRA and SIMS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



