PTLC ranks 2nd and IFV 15th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
IFV vs PTLC
PTLC −0.54pt a year
1.14%0.60%
PTLC 1.7×the volume
58K101K
PTLC +5.4pt
+5.5%+10.9%
IFV vs PTLC Performance
+15.5%+50.2%
- IFV 1.14%
- PTLC 0.60%, better
- IFV $203M
- PTLC $3.15B
- IFV +2.0%
- PTLC +7.6%, better
- IFV 2.08%, better
- PTLC 1.01%
- IFV 6
- PTLC 505
- IFV 58K sh
- PTLC 101K sh, better
- IFV $23.71
- PTLC $57.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFV | PTLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A71Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | D39 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A86Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. IFV and PTLC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFVD
PTLCA
In short
IFV Most international index funds spread you across dozens of countries. IFV holds five: whichever First Trust country and region ETFs show the strongest relative price momentum, equal-weighted, picked by rules rather than manager hunches.
PTLC Most index funds ride out every drawdown. PTLC tracks an index with an exit ramp: a rules-based trend signal that shifts its large-cap exposure toward 3-month Treasury bills and back, with no manager judgment in the loop.
Stated mandate
IFV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index. The index selects five First Trust international country- or region-based ETFs using relative-strength momentum and equal-weights them.
PTLC The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index. That index uses a rules-based trend-following approach that alternates exposure between equities and 3-Month US Treasury bills.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFV vs PTLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFV vs PTLC Cost
Overpaying IFV vs PTLC
$9,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFV 1.14%
$20,920
PTLC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFV | PTLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,998 | $1,076 | $922 |
| 20 | $7,462 | $4,116 | $3,346 |
| 30 | $20,920 | $11,817 | $9,103 |
- 1.14%IFV
- 0.60%PTLC, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
PTLC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
IFV 19th cheapest of 20 funds
IFV vs PTLC Dividends
- IFV 2.08%, better
- PTLC 1.01%
- IFV $0.50
- PTLC $0.59
- IFV $0.09
- PTLC $0.59
- IFV Sep 24, 2026
- PTLC Dec 30, 2025
- IFV Sep 30, 2026
- PTLC Jan 5, 2026
- IFV Quarterly
- PTLC Annual
Distribution history
IFV vs PTLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFV
- PTLC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFV 14.5%PTLC 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFV 0.67PTLC 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- IFV −32.2%PTLC −15.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IFV 0.94PTLC 0.87
IFV and PTLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.14% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
