PTMC ranks 4th and IFV 15th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
IFV vs PTMC
PTMC −0.54pt a year
1.14%0.60%
IFV 3.3×the volume
58K17.5K
PTMC +0.4pt
+5.5%+5.9%
IFV vs PTMC Performance
+15.5%+15.2%
- IFV 1.14%
- PTMC 0.60%, better
- IFV $203M
- PTMC $364M
- IFV +2.0%
- PTMC +15.6%, better
- IFV 2.08%, better
- PTMC 1.63%
- IFV 6
- PTMC 402
- IFV 58K sh, better
- PTMC 17.5K sh
- IFV $23.71
- PTMC $39.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFV | PTMC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A71Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D39 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A86Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A81 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. IFV and PTMC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFVD
PTMCA
In short
IFV Most international index funds spread you across dozens of countries. IFV holds five: whichever First Trust country and region ETFs show the strongest relative price momentum, equal-weighted, picked by rules rather than manager hunches.
PTMC A mid-cap index fund with a seatbelt built in. PTMC tracks a rules-based trend index that shifts the portfolio between roughly 400 US mid-cap stocks and defensive positioning, with no manager judgment in the loop. Running since 2015.
Stated mandate
IFV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index. The index selects five First Trust international country- or region-based ETFs using relative-strength momentum and equal-weights them.
PTMC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFV vs PTMC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFV vs PTMC Cost
Overpaying IFV vs PTMC
$9,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFV 1.14%
$20,920
PTMC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFV | PTMC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,998 | $1,076 | $922 |
| 20 | $7,462 | $4,116 | $3,346 |
| 30 | $20,920 | $11,817 | $9,103 |
- 1.14%IFV
- 0.60%PTMC, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
PTMC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
IFV 19th cheapest of 20 funds
IFV vs PTMC Dividends
- IFV 2.08%, better
- PTMC 1.63%
- IFV $0.50
- PTMC $0.66
- IFV $0.09
- PTMC $0.66
- IFV Sep 24, 2026
- PTMC Dec 30, 2025
- IFV Sep 30, 2026
- PTMC Jan 5, 2026
- IFV Quarterly
- PTMC Annual
Distribution history
IFV vs PTMC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFV
- PTMC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFV 14.5%PTMC 14.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFV 0.67, betterPTMC 0.48
- Worst fall
- IFV −32.2%PTMC −16.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IFV 0.94PTMC 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 1.14% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.