ONOF ranks 3rd and IFV 15th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
IFV vs ONOF
ONOF −0.75pt a year
1.14%0.39%
IFV 10.2×the volume
58K5.67K
ONOF +4.0pt
+2.9%+6.9%
IFV vs ONOF Performance
+15.5%+39.5%
- IFV 1.14%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- IFV $203M
- ONOF $136M
- IFV +2.0%
- ONOF +9.2%, better
- IFV 2.08%, better
- ONOF 1.23%
- IFV 6
- ONOF 506
- IFV 58K sh, better
- ONOF 5.67K sh
- IFV $23.71
- ONOF $39.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFV | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D39 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D38 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B56 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. IFV and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFVD
ONOFA
In short
IFV Most international index funds spread you across dozens of countries. IFV holds five: whichever First Trust country and region ETFs show the strongest relative price momentum, equal-weighted, picked by rules rather than manager hunches.
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
IFV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index. The index selects five First Trust international country- or region-based ETFs using relative-strength momentum and equal-weights them.
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFV vs ONOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFV vs ONOF Cost
Overpaying IFV vs ONOF
$13,022
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFV 1.14%
$20,920
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFV | ONOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,998 | $705 | $1,293 |
| 20 | $7,462 | $2,725 | $4,737 |
| 30 | $20,920 | $7,898 | $13,022 |
- 1.14%IFV
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
IFV 19th cheapest of 20 funds
IFV vs ONOF Dividends
- IFV 2.08%, better
- ONOF 1.23%
- IFV $0.50
- ONOF $0.49
- IFV $0.09
- ONOF $0.16
- IFV Sep 24, 2026
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- IFV Sep 30, 2026
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- IFV Quarterly
- ONOF Twice a year
Distribution history
IFV vs ONOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFV
- ONOF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFV 14.5%ONOF 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFV 0.67ONOF 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- IFV −32.2%ONOF −26.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IFV 0.94ONOF 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 1.14% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.