IGF ranks 2nd and RBLD 10th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IGF vs RBLD
IGF −0.28pt a year
0.37%0.65%
IGF 146.0×the volume
874K5.99K
IGF +0.7pt
+8.4%+7.7%
IGF vs RBLD Performance
+59.2%+63.5%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- RBLD 0.65%
- IGF $10.9B
- RBLD $42M
- IGF +11.2%
- RBLD +11.4%, better
- IGF 2.93%, better
- RBLD 1.04%
- IGF 89
- RBLD 104
- IGF 874K sh, better
- RBLD 5.99K sh
- IGF $65.84
- RBLD $84.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGF | RBLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D32 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | A77 |
| Holdings | A72 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | B62 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IGF and RBLD are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGFA
RBLDB
In short
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
RBLD First Trust's US-only infrastructure sleeve: roughly 100 stocks picked under Alerian's NextGen banner, quarterly distributions, and a shingle that has been hanging since 2008.
Stated mandate
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
RBLD The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses, using an indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGF vs RBLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGF vs RBLD Cost
Overpaying RBLD vs IGF
$5,204
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
RBLD 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGF | RBLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $1,163 | $493 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $4,440 | $1,850 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $12,717 | $5,204 |
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- 0.65%RBLD
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
RBLD 22nd cheapest of 33 funds
IGF vs RBLD Dividends
- IGF 2.93%, better
- RBLD 1.04%
- IGF $1.93
- RBLD $0.88
- IGF $0.93
- RBLD $0.22
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- RBLD Sep 24, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- RBLD Sep 30, 2026
- IGF Twice a year
- RBLD Quarterly
Distribution history
IGF vs RBLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGF
- RBLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGF 12.4%, betterRBLD 15.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGF 1.18, betterRBLD 1.06
- Worst fall
- IGF −20.8%, betterRBLD −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IGF 0.62RBLD 0.89
IGF and RBLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



