IFRA ranks 1st and RBLD 10th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IFRA vs RBLD
IFRA −0.35pt a year
0.30%0.65%
IFRA 66.4×the volume
398K5.99K
IFRA +1.7pt
+12.2%+10.5%
IFRA vs RBLD Performance
+77.5%+64.5%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- RBLD 0.65%
- IFRA $4.07B
- RBLD $42M
- IFRA +12.7%, better
- RBLD +11.2%
- IFRA 1.74%, better
- RBLD 1.04%
- IFRA 165
- RBLD 104
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- RBLD 5.99K sh
- IFRA $58.33
- RBLD $84.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFRA | RBLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D32 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B55 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A77 |
| Holdings | A82 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B62 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IFRA and RBLD are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFRAA
RBLDB
In short
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
RBLD First Trust's US-only infrastructure sleeve: roughly 100 stocks picked under Alerian's NextGen banner, quarterly distributions, and a shingle that has been hanging since 2008.
Stated mandate
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
RBLD The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses, using an indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFRA vs RBLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFRA vs RBLD Cost
Overpaying RBLD vs IFRA
$6,568
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
RBLD 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFRA | RBLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,163 | $618 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $4,440 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $12,717 | $6,568 |
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- 0.65%RBLD
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
RBLD 22nd cheapest of 33 funds
IFRA vs RBLD Dividends
- IFRA 1.74%, better
- RBLD 1.04%
- IFRA $1.02
- RBLD $0.88
- IFRA $0.26
- RBLD $0.22
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- RBLD Sep 24, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- RBLD Sep 30, 2026
- IFRA Quarterly
- RBLD Quarterly
Distribution history
IFRA vs RBLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFRA
- RBLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFRA 17.2%RBLD 15.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFRA 0.92RBLD 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- IFRA −19.9%, betterRBLD −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IFRA 0.96RBLD 0.89
IFRA and RBLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


