QTUM ranks 2nd and IGPT 5th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
IGPT vs QTUM
QTUM −0.17pt a year
0.57%0.40%
QTUM 2.1×the volume
173K359K
QTUM +8.2pt
+10.0%+18.2%
IGPT vs QTUM Performance
+61.2%+130.4%
- IGPT 0.57%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- IGPT $1.11B
- QTUM $4.59B
- IGPT +28.2%, better
- QTUM +12.9%
- IGPT 0.00%
- QTUM 1.14%, better
- IGPT 103
- QTUM 89
- IGPT 173K sh
- QTUM 359K sh, better
- IGPT $75.34
- QTUM $123.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGPT | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A73 | |
| Risk | C43 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | C40 | A92Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | A79 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. IGPT and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGPTB
QTUMA
In short
IGPT Born in 2005 as a software fund, re-aimed at AI in 2023. IGPT holds about 100 global companies that earn at least half their revenue from next-gen software work, at 0.57% a year.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
IGPT The fund provides exposure to global companies associated with next-generation artificial intelligence and software themes.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGPT vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGPT vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying IGPT vs QTUM
$3,181
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGPT 0.57%
$11,271
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGPT | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $723 | $300 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $2,793 | $1,128 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $8,090 | $3,181 |
- 0.57%IGPT
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
IGPT 9th cheapest of 30 funds
IGPT vs QTUM Dividends
- IGPT 0.00%
- QTUM 1.14%, better
- IGPT None
- QTUM $1.40
- IGPT
- QTUM $0.46
- IGPT
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- IGPT
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- IGPT
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
IGPT vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGPT
- QTUM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGPT 35.3%QTUM 28.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IGPT 0.97QTUM 1.30, better
- Worst fall
- IGPT −40.5%QTUM −38.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IGPT 2.09QTUM 1.67
IGPT and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



