Skip to content

IJH vs MCOW

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

IJHANYSE Arca

Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

MCOWDCboe

Overlap

19.2%by weight

Expense ratio

IJH −0.44pt a year

IJH0.05%MCOW0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

IJH 5330.8×the volume

IJH6.75MMCOW1.27K

IJH vs MCOW Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+16.1%IJH+13.2%MCOW

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. IJH +16.1%. MCOW +13.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%20%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IJH 0.05%, better
MCOW 0.49%
Fund size
IJH $121B
MCOW $1M
1Y total return
IJH +16.1%, better
MCOW +13.2%
Yield (12M)
IJH 1.21%
MCOW No data
Holdings
IJH 405
MCOW 81
Avg volume (30D)
IJH 6.75M sh, better
MCOW 1.27K sh
NAV per share
IJH $72.13
MCOW $21.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IJH: Cost 87, Risk 57, Mission 100, Tradability 84, Holdings 78, Durability 83. MCOW: Cost 5, Risk 10, Mission 89, Tradability 24, Holdings 25, Durability 6.
Pillar letters and Scores for IJH, MCOW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIJHMCOW
Cost30% weightA87HigherF5
Mission25% weightA100HigherA89
Risk15% weightB57HigherF10
Tradability15% weightA84HigherF24
Holdings10% weightA78HigherD25
Durability5% weightA83HigherF6

Rank among S&P MidCap 400 funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IJH and MCOW are both graded against the same 11 S&P MidCap 400 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P MidCap 400⁠

Category · 11 funds
See all 11 ›

IJH ranks 2nd and MCOW 11th of 11 funds in the S&P MidCap 400 Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPMDState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AIJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3AIVOOVanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 10CMIDEXtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 11DMCOWPacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IJHAiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

MCOWDPacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

In short

IJH The mid-cap middle child, done cheap. IJH has tracked the S&P MidCap 400 since 2000 for five basis points, and it's one of the most heavily traded ways to own roughly 400 mid-sized US companies.

MCOW No data

Stated mandate

IJH The fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Index and provide exposure to mid-sized U.S. companies. It is presented as a low-cost core portfolio holding.

MCOW No data

Why people hold it

  • IJH Five basis points a year, about a third of the typical cost in its S&P 400 peer group, and a fraction of MDY's 0.23% for the very same index.
  • Running since 2000 and among the most actively traded funds in the mid-cap aisle, with assets in the multi-billions.
  • The mandate is one line: hold the S&P MidCap 400, roughly 400 mid-sized US companies. No tilts, no screens, no style drift. Pays quarterly.ishares.com
  • iShares built it as a core building block, and it sits among the strongest implementations of this index in its peer group.ishares.com

MCOW No data

Worth knowing

  • IJH It is not the cheapest seat: SPMD tracks the same index at 0.03%. Two basis points, if cost is your only tiebreaker.
  • Mid-caps only. No mega-cap ballast, no small caps, so this works as a sleeve beside a large-cap core rather than a whole US portfolio.
  • All US, all stocks. Nothing here diversifies you outside American equity markets.

MCOW No data

Full IJH profile⁠

Full MCOW profile⁠

IJH vs MCOW Holdings

How IJH and MCOW differ

Overlap by weight

19.2%

Shared holdings make up 99.9% of MCOW and 19.2% of IJH.

Level by level

  • Holdings79 in both19.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors66.9%
  • Countryby domicile98.5%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in IJH and MCOW, widest gap first
SectorMore in IJHMore in MCOWGap
TechnologyMCOW +23.3 points
FinancialsIJH +11.3 points
Health CareMCOW +8.7 points
Real EstateIJH +7.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryIJH +3.9 points
MaterialsIJH +3.7 points
UtilitiesIJH +3.4 points
IndustrialsIJH +1.8 points
Consumer StaplesIJH +1.6 points
CommunicationMCOW +1.0 points
EnergyMCOW +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IJH and MCOW, widest gap first
CountryMore in IJHMore in MCOWGap
United StatesMCOW +1.2 points
United KingdomIJH +1.1 points
Other countries (3)IJH +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IJH6.7%
  • MCOW33.2%

Securities held

  • IJH400
  • MCOW79

Asset class

IJH
Stocks
MCOW
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in IJH321
  • In both79
  • Only in MCOW0

Only in IJH

321 securities, 80.6% of IJH by weight

  • United Therapeutics0.72%
  • Ati0.71%
  • Us Foods Holding0.69%

Only in MCOW

0 securities, 0.0% of MCOW by weight

Weight gaps

All 79 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in IJH and MCOW, widest gap first
HoldingMore in IJHMore in MCOWGap
Manhattan AssociatesMANHMCOW +4.19 points
DocusignDOCUMCOW +4.17 points
Medpace HoldingsMEDPMCOW +4.11 points
Exelixis IncEXELMCOW +3.29 points
Lattice SemiconductorLSCCMCOW +3.18 points
Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLCJAZZMCOW +2.26 points
QualysQLYSMCOW +2.22 points
RambusRMBSMCOW +1.91 points

All 409 IJH holdings⁠All 81 MCOW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IJH vs MCOW Cost

Overpaying MCOW vs IJH

$8,732

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IJH 0.05%

    $1,060

  • MCOW 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IJH 0.05%
  • MCOW 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MCOW $9,792IJH $1,060

Year by year

YearIJHMCOWOverpaying
10$92$883$791
20$360$3,394$3,034
30$1,060$9,792$8,732

Expense ratio

  • 0.05%IJH, cheaper
  • 0.49%MCOW
  • Middle half of S&P MidCap 400 funds
  • Median 0.15%

IJH 2nd cheapest of 11 funds

MCOW 11th cheapest of 11 funds

IJH vs MCOW Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
IJH 1.21%
MCOW No data
Payout (12M)
IJH $0.90
MCOW No data
Last payment
IJH $0.23
MCOW $0.01
Ex-dividend
IJH Sep 15, 2026
MCOW Sep 3, 2026
Paid on
IJH Sep 18, 2026
MCOW Sep 8, 2026
Frequency
IJH Quarterly
MCOW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IJHQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll IJH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.11; Jun 27, 2017 $0.12; Sep 26, 2017 $0.13; Dec 19, 2017 $0.10; Mar 22, 2018 $0.14; Jun 26, 2018 $0.17; Sep 26, 2018 $0.17; Dec 17, 2018 $0.09; Mar 20, 2019 $0.14; Jun 17, 2019 $0.18; Sep 24, 2019 $0.17; Dec 16, 2019 $0.18; Mar 25, 2020 $0.16; Jun 15, 2020 $0.13; Sep 23, 2020 $0.17; Dec 14, 2020 $0.13; Mar 25, 2021 $0.13; Jun 10, 2021 $0.15; Sep 24, 2021 $0.20; Dec 13, 2021 $0.19; Mar 24, 2022 $0.17; Jun 9, 2022 $0.16; Sep 26, 2022 $0.27; Dec 13, 2022 $0.22; Mar 23, 2023 $0.19; Jun 7, 2023 $0.15; Mar 21, 2024 $0.16; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Sep 25, 2024 $0.24; Dec 17, 2024 $0.27; Mar 18, 2025 $0.16; Jun 16, 2025 $0.19; Sep 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.33; Mar 17, 2026 $0.16; Jun 15, 2026 $0.19; Sep 15, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
MCOWQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll MCOW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.02; Mar 5, 2026 $0.0062; Jun 4, 2026 $0.02; Sep 3, 2026 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

IJH vs MCOW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IJH 15.0%MCOW 13.1%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IJH 0.84MCOW 0.43since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IJH −24.1%MCOW −15.0%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IJH 1.03MCOW 0.85

IJH and MCOW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IJHAvsSPMDA

    iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCOWDvsSPMDA

    Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IJHAvsIVOOA

    iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCOWDvsIVOOA

    Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF · Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IJHAvsMDYB

    iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · State Street SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCOWDvsMDYB

    Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.