Skip to content

IJH vs RWK

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

IJHANYSE Arca

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF

RWKCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IJH −0.34pt a year

IJH0.05%RWK0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

IJH 340.1×the volume

IJH6.58MRWK19.3K

10Y return · a year

RWK +2.1pt

IJH+10.8%RWK+12.9%

IJH vs RWK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+40.1%IJH+69.6%RWK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IJH +40.1%. RWK +69.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IJH 0.05%, better
RWK 0.39%
Fund size
IJH $123B
RWK $1.32B
1Y total return
IJH +14.4%
RWK +19.1%, better
Yield (12M)
IJH 1.23%, better
RWK 1.05%
Holdings
IJH 404
RWK 399
Avg volume (30D)
IJH 6.58M sh, better
RWK 19.3K sh
NAV per share
IJH $73.31
RWK $145.36
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IJH: Cost 87, Risk 52, Mission 100, Tradability 86, Holdings 83, Durability 82. RWK: Cost 14, Risk 49, Mission 95, Tradability 29, Holdings 35, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for IJH, RWK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIJHRWK
Cost30% weightA87HigherF14
Mission25% weightA100HigherA95
Risk15% weightC52HigherC49
Tradability15% weightA86HigherD29
Holdings10% weightA83HigherD35
Durability5% weightA82HigherC41

Rank among S&P MidCap 400 funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IJH and RWK are both graded against the same 11 S&P MidCap 400 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P MidCap 400⁠

Category · 11 funds
See all 11 ›

IJH ranks 2nd and RWK 9th of 11 funds in the S&P MidCap 400 Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPMDState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AIJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3AIVOOVanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 8BIJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 9CRWKInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 10CMIDEXtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IJHAiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

RWKCInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF

In short

IJH The mid-cap middle child, done cheap. IJH has tracked the S&P MidCap 400 since 2000 for five basis points, and it's one of the most heavily traded ways to own roughly 400 mid-sized US companies.

RWK Same 400 mid-cap companies as the standard S&P MidCap 400, but position size comes from annual revenue instead of market value. Sales set the weights, not sentiment. Invesco has run this playbook since 2008.

Stated mandate

IJH The fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Index and provide exposure to mid-sized U.S. companies. It is presented as a low-cost core portfolio holding.

RWK The fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index by investing at least 90% of its total assets in securities included in that Index.

Why people hold it

  • IJH Five basis points a year, about a third of the typical cost in its S&P 400 peer group, and a fraction of MDY's 0.23% for the very same index.
  • Running since 2000 and among the most actively traded funds in the mid-cap aisle, with assets in the multi-billions.
  • The mandate is one line: hold the S&P MidCap 400, roughly 400 mid-sized US companies. No tilts, no screens, no style drift. Pays quarterly.ishares.com
  • iShares built it as a core building block, and it sits among the strongest implementations of this index in its peer group.ishares.com
  • RWK The whole idea in one line: take the S&P MidCap 400 roster and reweight it by revenue. Big top-line companies get bigger slots, expensive-per-dollar-of-sales names get trimmed.spglobal.com
  • Roughly 400 holdings and a rules-based index behind them, so the portfolio is broad mid-cap rather than a stock-picker's short list.
  • It sticks close to the index it advertises. Tracking has been one of this fund's strongest attributes, so what you get matches what the fact sheet describes.
  • Distributions land on a quarterly schedule, and the fund has been through a full market cycle since its 2008 launch.

Worth knowing

  • IJH It is not the cheapest seat: SPMD tracks the same index at 0.03%. Two basis points, if cost is your only tiebreaker.
  • Mid-caps only. No mega-cap ballast, no small caps, so this works as a sleeve beside a large-cap core rather than a whole US portfolio.
  • All US, all stocks. Nothing here diversifies you outside American equity markets.
  • RWK 0.39% a year is the price of the twist. Plain S&P 400 trackers charge far less (SPMD 0.03%, IJH 0.05%), so the revenue tilt carries a real cost hurdle.
  • Volume is light next to the mid-cap heavyweights, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads on the way in and out.
  • Revenue weighting favors high-sales, thinner-margin businesses, so sector mix and value tilt drift away from the cap-weighted S&P MidCap 400.spglobal.com

Full IJH profile⁠

Full RWK profile⁠

IJH vs RWK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IJH vs RWK Cost

Overpaying RWK vs IJH

$6,838

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IJH 0.05%

    $1,060

  • RWK 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IJH 0.05%
  • RWK 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RWK $7,898IJH $1,060

Year by year

YearIJHRWKOverpaying
10$92$705$613
20$360$2,725$2,365
30$1,060$7,898$6,838

Expense ratio

  • 0.05%IJH, cheaper
  • 0.39%RWK
  • Middle half of S&P MidCap 400 funds
  • Median 0.15%

IJH 2nd cheapest of 11 funds

RWK 10th cheapest of 11 funds

IJH vs RWK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IJH 1.23%, better
RWK 1.05%
Payout (12M)
IJH $0.90
RWK $1.52
Last payment
IJH $0.23
RWK $0.41
Ex-dividend
IJH Sep 15, 2026
RWK Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
IJH Sep 18, 2026
RWK Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
IJH Quarterly
RWK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IJHQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll IJH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.11; Jun 27, 2017 $0.12; Sep 26, 2017 $0.13; Dec 19, 2017 $0.10; Mar 22, 2018 $0.14; Jun 26, 2018 $0.17; Sep 26, 2018 $0.17; Dec 17, 2018 $0.09; Mar 20, 2019 $0.14; Jun 17, 2019 $0.18; Sep 24, 2019 $0.17; Dec 16, 2019 $0.18; Mar 25, 2020 $0.16; Jun 15, 2020 $0.13; Sep 23, 2020 $0.17; Dec 14, 2020 $0.13; Mar 25, 2021 $0.13; Jun 10, 2021 $0.15; Sep 24, 2021 $0.20; Dec 13, 2021 $0.19; Mar 24, 2022 $0.17; Jun 9, 2022 $0.16; Sep 26, 2022 $0.27; Dec 13, 2022 $0.22; Mar 23, 2023 $0.19; Jun 7, 2023 $0.15; Mar 21, 2024 $0.16; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Sep 25, 2024 $0.24; Dec 17, 2024 $0.27; Mar 18, 2025 $0.16; Jun 16, 2025 $0.19; Sep 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.33; Mar 17, 2026 $0.16; Jun 15, 2026 $0.19; Sep 15, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
RWKQuarterly · 38 paymentsAll RWK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 38 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Apr 4, 2017 $0.12; Oct 3, 2017 $0.16; Dec 28, 2017 $0.18; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 19, 2018 $0.15; Sep 25, 2018 $0.16; Dec 26, 2018 $0.21; Mar 19, 2019 $0.10; Jun 24, 2019 $0.16; Sep 23, 2019 $0.20; Dec 23, 2019 $0.25; Mar 23, 2020 $0.22; Jun 22, 2020 $0.17; Sep 21, 2020 $0.14; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.17; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.27; Dec 20, 2021 $0.20; Mar 21, 2022 $0.23; Jun 21, 2022 $0.29; Sep 19, 2022 $0.27; Dec 19, 2022 $0.22; Mar 20, 2023 $0.27; Jun 20, 2023 $0.30; Sep 18, 2023 $0.24; Dec 18, 2023 $0.29; Mar 18, 2024 $0.32; Jun 24, 2024 $0.34; Sep 23, 2024 $0.31; Dec 23, 2024 $0.33; Mar 24, 2025 $0.38; Jun 23, 2025 $0.47; Sep 22, 2025 $0.37; Dec 22, 2025 $0.37; Mar 23, 2026 $0.40; Jun 22, 2026 $0.34; Sep 21, 2026 $0.41. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

IJH vs RWK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IJH
  • RWK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IJH −24.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IJH 15.0%, betterRWK 16.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IJH 0.84RWK 0.89, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IJH −24.1%, betterRWK −24.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IJH 1.03RWK 1.04

IJH and RWK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IJHAvsSPMDA

    iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWKCvsSPMDA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IJHAvsIVOOA

    iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWKCvsIVOOA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF · Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IJHAvsMDYB

    iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · State Street SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWKCvsMDYB

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF · State Street SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.