IJH ranks 2nd and RWK 9th of 11 funds in the S&P MidCap 400 Category.
IJH vs RWK
IJH −0.34pt a year
0.05%0.39%
IJH 340.1×the volume
6.58M19.3K
RWK +2.1pt
+10.8%+12.9%
IJH vs RWK Performance
+40.1%+69.6%
- IJH 0.05%, better
- RWK 0.39%
- IJH $123B
- RWK $1.32B
- IJH +14.4%
- RWK +19.1%, better
- IJH 1.23%, better
- RWK 1.05%
- IJH 404
- RWK 399
- IJH 6.58M sh, better
- RWK 19.3K sh
- IJH $73.31
- RWK $145.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IJH | RWK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | F14 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A95 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A82Higher | C41 |
Rank among S&P MidCap 400 funds
Same Category. IJH and RWK are both graded against the same 11 S&P MidCap 400 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IJHA
RWKC
In short
IJH The mid-cap middle child, done cheap. IJH has tracked the S&P MidCap 400 since 2000 for five basis points, and it's one of the most heavily traded ways to own roughly 400 mid-sized US companies.
RWK Same 400 mid-cap companies as the standard S&P MidCap 400, but position size comes from annual revenue instead of market value. Sales set the weights, not sentiment. Invesco has run this playbook since 2008.
Stated mandate
IJH The fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Index and provide exposure to mid-sized U.S. companies. It is presented as a low-cost core portfolio holding.
RWK The fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index by investing at least 90% of its total assets in securities included in that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IJH vs RWK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IJH vs RWK Cost
Overpaying RWK vs IJH
$6,838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IJH 0.05%
$1,060
RWK 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IJH | RWK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $705 | $613 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,725 | $2,365 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $7,898 | $6,838 |
- 0.05%IJH, cheaper
- 0.39%RWK
- Middle half of S&P MidCap 400 funds
- Median 0.15%
IJH 2nd cheapest of 11 funds
RWK 10th cheapest of 11 funds
IJH vs RWK Dividends
- IJH 1.23%, better
- RWK 1.05%
- IJH $0.90
- RWK $1.52
- IJH $0.23
- RWK $0.41
- IJH Sep 15, 2026
- RWK Sep 21, 2026
- IJH Sep 18, 2026
- RWK Sep 25, 2026
- IJH Quarterly
- RWK Quarterly
Distribution history
IJH vs RWK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IJH
- RWK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IJH 15.0%, betterRWK 16.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- IJH 0.84RWK 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- IJH −24.1%, betterRWK −24.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IJH 1.03RWK 1.04
IJH and RWK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

