Skip to content

ILCG vs RKSG

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

ILCGANYSE Arca

Ruk Strategic Growth ETF

RKSGCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ILCG −0.46pt a year

ILCG0.04%RKSG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

ILCG 135.4×the volume

ILCG70.4KRKSG520

ILCG vs RKSG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.4%ILCG+3.7%RKSG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ILCG −1.4%. RKSG +3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ILCG 0.04%, better
RKSG 0.50%
Fund size
ILCG $3B
RKSG $3M
1Y total return
ILCG +3.2%
RKSG No data
Yield (12M)
ILCG 0.44%
RKSG No data
Holdings
ILCG 328
RKSG 249
Avg volume (30D)
ILCG 70.4K sh, better
RKSG 520 sh
NAV per share
ILCG $109.98
RKSG $28.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ILCG: Cost 96, Risk 44, Mission 100, Tradability 64, Holdings 49, Durability 64. RKSG: Cost 18, Risk 99, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 60, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for ILCG, RKSG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarILCGRKSG
Cost30% weightA96HigherF18
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightC44A99Higher
Tradability15% weightB64HigherD26
Holdings10% weightC49B60Higher
Durability5% weightB64HigherF21

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ILCG and RKSG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

ILCG ranks 2nd and RKSG 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 32CQMIDWisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth FundScore 40
  5. Rank 32CRKSGRuk Strategic Growth ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 34DFSGSFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ILCGAiShares Morningstar Growth ETF

RKSGCRuk Strategic Growth ETF

In short

ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.

RKSG Three screens (growth, momentum, value) folded into one passive US stock index instead of three separate funds. A 2026 launch charging 0.50% in a corner of the market where the giants charge pennies.

Stated mandate

ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.

RKSG The Fund passively seeks to track the pre-fee total return of the Ruk Strategic Growth Index.

Why people hold it

  • ILCG 0.04% a year. The typical fund in its factor peer group charges roughly eight times that, so almost none of the return leaks out the fee door.
  • Uses Morningstar's growth definition (earnings, sales, cash flow, book value) rather than S&P's or Russell's, and reaches into mid caps, not just the S&P 500.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2004, a multi-billion-dollar fund holding roughly 300 stocks. Long-running plumbing, not a launch-week experiment.
  • Tracking has been tight, and the fund sits in the upper half of its factor cohort overall, with cost doing much of the heavy lifting.
  • RKSG One wrapper, three factor screens: the Ruk Strategic Growth Index blends growth, momentum and value, so you're not stacking three single-factor funds to get a multifactor tilt.
  • Rules, not hunches. It passively tracks a published index rather than leaning on a manager's stock picks, so holdings are set by the index methodology.
  • Plain plumbing: a 1940 Act US equity ETF. No K-1, no commodity-pool paperwork, just a standard fund holding US stocks.

Worth knowing

  • ILCG Pure growth means no value ballast, and the ride has been bumpier than most funds in its factor group. The style can sit out of favor for long stretches.
  • Concentration runs high for the cohort: cap-weighted growth screens funnel a big share of the fund into the same handful of mega-cap names.
  • Moderately traded, not a tape leader. Sibling IUSG applies S&P's growth definition at the same 0.04%, so the pick is which index rulebook you prefer.
  • RKSG Fee gap is real: 0.50% a year against the largest US growth index funds at 0.03% to 0.06% (VUG, SCHG, VONG). The multifactor blend has to earn that difference.
  • It launched in 2026, so the record is short and the asset base is small. Thin trading tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than the household-name growth funds.
  • The index is the issuer's own, and there isn't yet enough history to see how tightly the fund hugs it. Growth is the goal here, not income.

Full ILCG profile⁠

Full RKSG profile⁠

ILCG vs RKSG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ILCG vs RKSG Cost

Overpaying RKSG vs ILCG

$9,130

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ILCG 0.04%

    $849

  • RKSG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ILCG 0.04%
  • RKSG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530RKSG $9,979ILCG $849

Year by year

YearILCGRKSGOverpaying
10$73$900$827
20$288$3,460$3,172
30$849$9,979$9,130

Expense ratio

  • 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
  • 0.50%RKSG
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

RKSG 30th cheapest of 35 funds

ILCG vs RKSG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ILCG 0.44%
RKSG No data
Payout (12M)
ILCG $0.48
RKSG None
Last payment
ILCG $0.14
RKSG No data
Ex-dividend
ILCG Sep 15, 2026
RKSG No data
Paid on
ILCG Sep 18, 2026
RKSG No data
Frequency
ILCG Quarterly
RKSG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ILCGQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll ILCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.05; Jun 27, 2017 $0.07; Sep 26, 2017 $0.09; Dec 19, 2017 $0.07; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 26, 2018 $0.08; Sep 26, 2018 $0.05; Dec 17, 2018 $0.07; Mar 20, 2019 $0.05; Jun 17, 2019 $0.05; Sep 24, 2019 $0.05; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.03; Mar 25, 2020 $0.05; Jun 15, 2020 $0.04; Sep 23, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.04; Mar 25, 2021 $0.02; Jun 10, 2021 $0.06; Sep 24, 2021 $0.08; Dec 13, 2021 $0.08; Mar 24, 2022 $0.08; Jun 9, 2022 $0.07; Sep 26, 2022 $0.11; Dec 13, 2022 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.08; Sep 26, 2023 $0.12; Dec 20, 2023 $0.15; Mar 21, 2024 $0.10; Jun 11, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Mar 18, 2025 $0.10; Jun 16, 2025 $0.10; Sep 16, 2025 $0.14; Dec 16, 2025 $0.15; Mar 17, 2026 $0.10; Jun 15, 2026 $0.09; Sep 15, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
RKSGAll RKSG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ILCG vs RKSG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ILCG 17.8%RKSG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ILCG 1.06RKSG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ILCG −35.4%RKSG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ILCG 1.23RKSG 1.01

ILCG and RKSG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ILCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RKSGCvsSPYGA

    Ruk Strategic Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCGAvsIMCGA

    iShares Morningstar Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RKSGCvsIMCGA

    Ruk Strategic Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RKSGCvsSCHGA

    Ruk Strategic Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.