Skip to content

IMCG vs RKSG

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

Ruk Strategic Growth ETF

RKSGCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IMCG −0.44pt a year

IMCG0.06%RKSG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

IMCG 254.5×the volume

IMCG132KRKSG520

IMCG vs RKSG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.8%IMCG+3.7%RKSG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. IMCG −1.8%. RKSG +3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCG 0.06%, better
RKSG 0.50%
Fund size
IMCG $4.04B
RKSG $3M
1Y total return
IMCG +14.0%
RKSG No data
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.67%
RKSG No data
Holdings
IMCG 262
RKSG 249
Avg volume (30D)
IMCG 132K sh, better
RKSG 520 sh
NAV per share
IMCG $93.24
RKSG $28.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCG: Cost 78, Risk 78, Mission 95, Tradability 61, Holdings 75, Durability 66. RKSG: Cost 18, Risk 99, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 60, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCG, RKSG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCGRKSG
Cost30% weightA78HigherF18
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightA78A99Higher
Tradability15% weightB61HigherD26
Holdings10% weightA75HigherB60
Durability5% weightB66HigherF21

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMCG and RKSG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

IMCG ranks 2nd and RKSG 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 32CQMIDWisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth FundScore 40
  6. Rank 32CRKSGRuk Strategic Growth ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 34DFSGSFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

RKSGCRuk Strategic Growth ETF

In short

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

RKSG Three screens (growth, momentum, value) folded into one passive US stock index instead of three separate funds. A 2026 launch charging 0.50% in a corner of the market where the giants charge pennies.

Stated mandate

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

RKSG The Fund passively seeks to track the pre-fee total return of the Ruk Strategic Growth Index.

Why people hold it

  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.
  • RKSG One wrapper, three factor screens: the Ruk Strategic Growth Index blends growth, momentum and value, so you're not stacking three single-factor funds to get a multifactor tilt.
  • Rules, not hunches. It passively tracks a published index rather than leaning on a manager's stock picks, so holdings are set by the index methodology.
  • Plain plumbing: a 1940 Act US equity ETF. No K-1, no commodity-pool paperwork, just a standard fund holding US stocks.

Worth knowing

  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.
  • RKSG Fee gap is real: 0.50% a year against the largest US growth index funds at 0.03% to 0.06% (VUG, SCHG, VONG). The multifactor blend has to earn that difference.
  • It launched in 2026, so the record is short and the asset base is small. Thin trading tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than the household-name growth funds.
  • The index is the issuer's own, and there isn't yet enough history to see how tightly the fund hugs it. Growth is the goal here, not income.

Full IMCG profile⁠

Full RKSG profile⁠

IMCG vs RKSG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCG vs RKSG Cost

Overpaying RKSG vs IMCG

$8,709

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMCG 0.06%

    $1,270

  • RKSG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMCG 0.06%
  • RKSG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530RKSG $9,979IMCG $1,270

Year by year

YearIMCGRKSGOverpaying
10$110$900$790
20$432$3,460$3,028
30$1,270$9,979$8,709

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
  • 0.50%RKSG
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

RKSG 30th cheapest of 35 funds

IMCG vs RKSG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.67%
RKSG No data
Payout (12M)
IMCG $0.62
RKSG None
Last payment
IMCG $0.19
RKSG No data
Ex-dividend
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
RKSG No data
Paid on
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
RKSG No data
Frequency
IMCG Quarterly
RKSG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
RKSGAll RKSG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IMCG vs RKSG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCG 16.6%RKSG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCG 0.97RKSG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCG −35.1%RKSG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMCG 1.14RKSG 1.01

IMCG and RKSG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IMCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RKSGCvsSPYGA

    Ruk Strategic Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsILCGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RKSGCvsILCGA

    Ruk Strategic Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RKSGCvsSCHGA

    Ruk Strategic Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.