IMCG ranks 2nd and RKSG 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs RKSG
IMCG −0.44pt a year
0.06%0.50%
IMCG 254.5×the volume
132K520
IMCG vs RKSG Performance
−1.8%+3.7%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- RKSG 0.50%
- IMCG $4.04B
- RKSG $3M
- IMCG +14.0%
- RKSG
- IMCG 0.67%
- RKSG
- IMCG 262
- RKSG 249
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- RKSG 520 sh
- IMCG $93.24
- RKSG $28.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | RKSG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A78 | A99Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | B60 |
| Durability | B66Higher | F21 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and RKSG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
RKSGC
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
RKSG Three screens (growth, momentum, value) folded into one passive US stock index instead of three separate funds. A 2026 launch charging 0.50% in a corner of the market where the giants charge pennies.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
RKSG The Fund passively seeks to track the pre-fee total return of the Ruk Strategic Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs RKSG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs RKSG Cost
Overpaying RKSG vs IMCG
$8,709
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
RKSG 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | RKSG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $900 | $790 |
| 20 | $432 | $3,460 | $3,028 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $9,979 | $8,709 |
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- 0.50%RKSG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
RKSG 30th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs RKSG Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%
- RKSG
- IMCG $0.62
- RKSG None
- IMCG $0.19
- RKSG
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- RKSG
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- RKSG
- IMCG Quarterly
- RKSG
Distribution history
IMCG vs RKSG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%RKSG
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97RKSG
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%RKSG
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14RKSG 1.01
IMCG and RKSG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

