Skip to content

ILCG vs SNPG

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

ILCGANYSE Arca

Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF

SNPGBCboe

Overlap

38.9%by weight

Expense ratio

ILCG −0.11pt a year

ILCG0.04%SNPG0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

ILCG 48.9×the volume

ILCG70.4KSNPG1.44K

3Y return · a year

ILCG +0.3pt

ILCG+24.0%SNPG+23.7%

ILCG vs SNPG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.2%ILCG+8.2%SNPG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ILCG +3.2%. SNPG +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ILCG 0.04%, better
SNPG 0.15%
Fund size
ILCG $3B
SNPG $14M
1Y total return
ILCG +3.2%
SNPG +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
ILCG 0.44%
SNPG 0.48%, better
Holdings
ILCG 328
SNPG 85
Avg volume (30D)
ILCG 70.4K sh, better
SNPG 1.44K sh
NAV per share
ILCG $109.98
SNPG $56.79
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ILCG: Cost 96, Risk 44, Mission 100, Tradability 64, Holdings 49, Durability 64. SNPG: Cost 56, Risk 64, Mission 95, Tradability 30, Holdings 47, Durability 16.
Pillar letters and Scores for ILCG, SNPG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarILCGSNPG
Cost30% weightA96HigherB56
Mission25% weightA100HigherA95
Risk15% weightC44B64Higher
Tradability15% weightB64HigherD30
Holdings10% weightC49HigherC47
Durability5% weightB64HigherF16

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ILCG and SNPG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

ILCG ranks 2nd and SNPG 19th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 19BIWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 19BSNPGXtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 22BCOWGPacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ILCGAiShares Morningstar Growth ETF

SNPGBXtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF

In short

ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.

SNPG Xtrackers runs the S&P 500's growth side through a scored-and-screened filter, landing on roughly 90 large-cap names instead of the full growth sleeve, priced under the growth-ETF median.

Stated mandate

ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.

SNPG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened Index through a passive indexing approach.

Why people hold it

  • ILCG 0.04% a year. The typical fund in its factor peer group charges roughly eight times that, so almost none of the return leaks out the fee door.
  • Uses Morningstar's growth definition (earnings, sales, cash flow, book value) rather than S&P's or Russell's, and reaches into mid caps, not just the S&P 500.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2004, a multi-billion-dollar fund holding roughly 300 stocks. Long-running plumbing, not a launch-week experiment.
  • Tracking has been tight, and the fund sits in the upper half of its factor cohort overall, with cost doing much of the heavy lifting.
  • SNPG 0.15% a year, below the 0.18% median for US growth ETFs.
  • Tracks the S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened Index closely, one of the stronger index-replication records in its peer group.
  • Roughly 90 holdings, so it's a filtered read on large-cap growth rather than a catch-all basket. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • ILCG Pure growth means no value ballast, and the ride has been bumpier than most funds in its factor group. The style can sit out of favor for long stretches.
  • Concentration runs high for the cohort: cap-weighted growth screens funnel a big share of the fund into the same handful of mega-cap names.
  • Moderately traded, not a tape leader. Sibling IUSG applies S&P's growth definition at the same 0.04%, so the pick is which index rulebook you prefer.
  • SNPG Small asset base and thin trading volume, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the household-name growth funds carry.
  • The plain-vanilla giants undercut it on fees: VUG at 0.03%, SPYG and SCHG at 0.04%.
  • The scoring and screening step means the portfolio is a subset of the S&P 500 growth cohort, so returns can diverge from unscreened growth benchmarks.

Full ILCG profile⁠

Full SNPG profile⁠

ILCG vs SNPG Holdings

How ILCG and SNPG differ

Overlap by weight

38.9%

Shared holdings make up 84.4% of SNPG and 45.8% of ILCG.

Level by level

  • Holdings62 in both38.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors85.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.6%

Sector

Sector weights in ILCG and SNPG, widest gap first
SectorMore in ILCGMore in SNPG
Health CareSNPG +6.6 points
TechnologyILCG +6.1 points
FinancialsSNPG +5.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryILCG +5.0 points
CommunicationSNPG +2.7 points
EnergyILCG +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesILCG +0.7 points
IndustrialsILCG +0.7 points
MaterialsILCG +0.5 points
UtilitiesILCG +0.5 points
Real EstateILCG +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ILCG and SNPG, widest gap first
CountryMore in ILCGMore in SNPG
United StatesSNPG +0.2 points
ChinaSNPG +0.3 points
BrazilILCG +0.1 points
MexicoILCG +0.1 points
SwitzerlandILCG +0.1 points
United KingdomILCG +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ILCG49.8%
  • SNPG54.1%

Securities held

  • ILCG325
  • SNPG84

Asset class

ILCG
Equity
SNPG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ILCG263
  • In both62
  • Only in SNPG22

Only in ILCG

263 securities, 54.1% of ILCG by weight

  • Apple8.12%
  • Broadcom Inc4.92%
  • Amazon.com Inc4.21%

Only in SNPG

22 securities, 15.2% of SNPG by weight

  • AbbVie Inc1.98%
  • Cisco Systems Inc1.81%
  • Amgen Inc1.42%

Weight gaps

All 62 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ILCG and SNPG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ILCGMore in SNPG
NVIDIANVDAILCG +6.86 points
Micron TechnologyMUSNPG +6.49 points
MicrosoftMSFTSNPG +5.99 points
Eli LillyLLYSNPG +5.72 points
Visa Class AVSNPG +2.06 points
Mastercard Class AMASNPG +1.92 points
Caterpillar IncCATSNPG +1.86 points
Applied Material IncAMATSNPG +1.56 points

All 325 ILCG holdings⁠All 85 SNPG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ILCG vs SNPG Cost

Overpaying SNPG vs ILCG

$2,288

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ILCG 0.04%

    $849

  • SNPG 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ILCG 0.04%
  • SNPG 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530SNPG $3,137ILCG $849

Year by year

YearILCGSNPGOverpaying
10$73$274$201
20$288$1,071$783
30$849$3,137$2,288

Expense ratio

  • 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
  • 0.15%SNPG
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

SNPG 16th cheapest of 35 funds

ILCG vs SNPG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ILCG 0.44%
SNPG 0.48%, better
Payout (12M)
ILCG $0.48
SNPG $0.27
Last payment
ILCG $0.14
SNPG $0.07
Ex-dividend
ILCG Sep 15, 2026
SNPG Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ILCG Sep 18, 2026
SNPG Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
ILCG Quarterly
SNPG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ILCGQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll ILCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.05; Jun 27, 2017 $0.07; Sep 26, 2017 $0.09; Dec 19, 2017 $0.07; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 26, 2018 $0.08; Sep 26, 2018 $0.05; Dec 17, 2018 $0.07; Mar 20, 2019 $0.05; Jun 17, 2019 $0.05; Sep 24, 2019 $0.05; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.03; Mar 25, 2020 $0.05; Jun 15, 2020 $0.04; Sep 23, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.04; Mar 25, 2021 $0.02; Jun 10, 2021 $0.06; Sep 24, 2021 $0.08; Dec 13, 2021 $0.08; Mar 24, 2022 $0.08; Jun 9, 2022 $0.07; Sep 26, 2022 $0.11; Dec 13, 2022 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.08; Sep 26, 2023 $0.12; Dec 20, 2023 $0.15; Mar 21, 2024 $0.10; Jun 11, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Mar 18, 2025 $0.10; Jun 16, 2025 $0.10; Sep 16, 2025 $0.14; Dec 16, 2025 $0.15; Mar 17, 2026 $0.10; Jun 15, 2026 $0.09; Sep 15, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
SNPGQuarterly · 16 paymentsAll SNPG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2022 $0.05; Mar 17, 2023 $0.05; Jun 23, 2023 $0.09; Sep 15, 2023 $0.08; Dec 15, 2023 $0.11; Mar 15, 2024 $0.06; Jun 21, 2024 $0.06; Sep 20, 2024 $0.05; Dec 20, 2024 $0.09; Mar 21, 2025 $0.04; Jun 20, 2025 $0.07; Sep 19, 2025 $0.07; Dec 19, 2025 $0.09; Mar 20, 2026 $0.05; Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

ILCG vs SNPG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ILCG 17.8%SNPG 15.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ILCG 1.06SNPG 1.18, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ILCG −35.4%SNPG −21.7%since Nov 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ILCG 1.23SNPG 1.08

ILCG and SNPG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ILCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNPGBvsSPYGA

    Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCGAvsIMCGA

    iShares Morningstar Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNPGBvsIMCGA

    Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNPGBvsSCHGA

    Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.