IMCG ranks 2nd and SNPG 19th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs SNPG
IMCG −0.09pt a year
0.06%0.15%
IMCG 92.0×the volume
132K1.44K
SNPG +2.7pt
+21.0%+23.7%
IMCG vs SNPG Performance
+14.0%+8.2%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- SNPG 0.15%
- IMCG $4.04B
- SNPG $14M
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- SNPG +8.2%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- SNPG 0.48%
- IMCG 262
- SNPG 85
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- SNPG 1.44K sh
- IMCG $93.24
- SNPG $56.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | SNPG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | B56 |
| Mission | A95 | A95 |
| Risk | A78Higher | B64 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C47 |
| Durability | B66Higher | F16 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and SNPG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
SNPGB
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
SNPG Xtrackers runs the S&P 500's growth side through a scored-and-screened filter, landing on roughly 90 large-cap names instead of the full growth sleeve, priced under the growth-ETF median.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
SNPG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened Index through a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs SNPG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs SNPG Cost
Overpaying SNPG vs IMCG
$1,867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
SNPG 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | SNPG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $274 | $164 |
| 20 | $432 | $1,071 | $639 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $3,137 | $1,867 |
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- 0.15%SNPG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
SNPG 16th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs SNPG Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- SNPG 0.48%
- IMCG $0.62
- SNPG $0.27
- IMCG $0.19
- SNPG $0.07
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- SNPG Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- SNPG Sep 25, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- SNPG Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs SNPG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%SNPG 15.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97SNPG 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%SNPG −21.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14SNPG 1.08
IMCG and SNPG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

