ILCV ranks 2nd and JHML 18th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs JHML
ILCV −0.25pt a year
0.04%0.29%
JHML 1.1×the volume
24.4K27.7K
JHML +1.8pt
+12.3%+14.1%
ILCV vs JHML Performance
+81.1%+65.2%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- JHML 0.29%
- ILCV $1.37B
- JHML $1.17B
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- JHML +14.4%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- JHML 0.95%
- ILCV 375
- JHML 776
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- JHML 27.7K sh, better
- ILCV $109.27
- JHML $89.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | JHML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A82 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | B64 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and JHML are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
JHMLA
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
JHML Dimensional builds the index, John Hancock runs the fund. JHML holds roughly 800 of the largest US companies, then leans the weights toward smaller, cheaper, more profitable names and caps any single stock at 4%.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
JHML The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs JHML Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs JHML Cost
Overpaying JHML vs ILCV
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
JHML 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | JHML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $527 | $454 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,044 | $1,756 |
| 30 | $849 | $5,952 | $5,103 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.29%JHML
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
JHML 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs JHML Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- JHML 0.95%
- ILCV $1.65
- JHML $0.86
- ILCV $0.42
- JHML $0.39
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- JHML Jun 26, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- JHML Jun 30, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- JHML Twice a year
Distribution history
ILCV vs JHML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- JHML
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterJHML 12.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterJHML 1.35
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterJHML −23.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82JHML 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.