Skip to content

JHML vs VYM

John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF

JHMLANYSE Arca

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.25pt a year

JHML0.29%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 41.3×the volume

JHML27.7KVYM1.14M

10Y return · a year

JHML +2.1pt

JHML+14.1%VYM+12.0%

JHML vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+65.2%JHML+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. JHML +65.2%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JHML 0.29%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
JHML $1.17B
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
JHML +14.4%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
JHML 0.95%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
JHML 776
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
JHML 27.7K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
JHML $89.93
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JHML: Cost 55, Risk 60, Mission 100, Tradability 74, Holdings 61, Durability 69. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for JHML, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJHMLVYM
Cost30% weightB55A99Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA79
Risk15% weightB60A84Higher
Tradability15% weightA74HigherB61
Holdings10% weightB61HigherC53
Durability5% weightB69A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JHML and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and JHML 18th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 18AFLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 18AJHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETFScore 71
  7. Rank 18AONEOState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETFScore 71

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JHMLAJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

JHML Dimensional builds the index, John Hancock runs the fund. JHML holds roughly 800 of the largest US companies, then leans the weights toward smaller, cheaper, more profitable names and caps any single stock at 4%.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

JHML The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • JHML The index is developed and maintained by Dimensional Fund Advisors: weights tilt toward smaller market caps, lower relative price and higher profitability, reconstituted twice a year.sec.govjhinvestments.com
  • A 4% cap on any one company at reconstitution, spread across about 800 names, keeps the portfolio far less top-heavy than a straight cap-weighted large cap fund.sec.gov
  • It has tracked its Dimensional index very closely, and stands among the stronger implementations in a crowded multifactor large cap field.
  • Running since 2015, it has a decade of live history under the same rules-based index, not a backtest.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • JHML Fee is 0.29% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027 (0.32% gross), near the category median. Simpler factor peers like LRGF (0.08%) and VYM (0.04%) charge much less.
  • Trading is thin for a multi-billion-dollar fund, so spreads can run wider than the household-name large cap ETFs. Limit orders are the usual tool here.
  • Those size, value and profitability tilts mean the return path can diverge from a cap-weighted large cap index, in either direction, for long stretches.sec.gov
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full JHML profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

JHML vs VYM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JHML vs VYM Cost

Overpaying JHML vs VYM

$5,103

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JHML 0.29%

    $5,952

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JHML 0.29%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530JHML $5,952VYM $849

Year by year

YearJHMLVYMOverpaying
10$527$73$454
20$2,044$288$1,756
30$5,952$849$5,103

Expense ratio

  • 0.29%JHML
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

JHML 43rd cheapest of 99 funds

JHML vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JHML 0.95%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
JHML $0.86
VYM $3.68
Last payment
JHML $0.39
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
JHML Jun 26, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
JHML Jun 30, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
JHML Twice a year
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

JHMLTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll JHML payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 26, 2017 $0.21; Dec 26, 2017 $0.29; Jun 26, 2018 $0.22; Dec 24, 2018 $0.28; Jun 25, 2019 $0.31; Dec 24, 2019 $0.40; Jun 25, 2020 $0.36; Dec 24, 2020 $0.39; Jun 25, 2021 $0.29; Dec 27, 2021 $0.35; Jun 27, 2022 $0.28; Dec 27, 2022 $0.44; Jun 27, 2023 $0.35; Dec 26, 2023 $0.47; Jun 26, 2024 $0.34; Dec 27, 2024 $0.47; Jun 26, 2025 $0.38; Dec 29, 2025 $0.47; Jun 26, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

JHML vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JHML
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: JHML −23.5% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JHML 12.0%VYM 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JHML 1.35VYM 1.38, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JHML −23.5%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JHML 0.97VYM 0.75

JHML and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • JHMLAvsVONVA

    John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JHMLAvsILCVA

    John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JHMLAvsIMCVA

    John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.