VONV ranks 1st and JHML 18th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
JHML vs VONV
VONV −0.23pt a year
0.29%0.06%
VONV 27.9×the volume
27.7K774K
JHML +2.1pt
+14.1%+12.0%
JHML vs VONV Performance
+65.2%+73.8%
- JHML 0.29%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- JHML $1.17B
- VONV $23.3B
- JHML +14.4%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- JHML 0.95%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- JHML 776
- VONV 873
- JHML 27.7K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- JHML $89.93
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHML | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B60 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B69 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. JHML and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHMLA
VONVA
In short
JHML Dimensional builds the index, John Hancock runs the fund. JHML holds roughly 800 of the largest US companies, then leans the weights toward smaller, cheaper, more profitable names and caps any single stock at 4%.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
JHML The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHML vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHML vs VONV Cost
Overpaying JHML vs VONV
$4,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHML 0.29%
$5,952
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHML | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $110 | $417 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $432 | $1,612 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $1,270 | $4,682 |
- 0.29%JHML
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
JHML 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
JHML vs VONV Dividends
- JHML 0.95%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- JHML $0.86
- VONV $1.74
- JHML $0.39
- VONV $0.42
- JHML Jun 26, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- JHML Jun 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- JHML Twice a year
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
JHML vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JHML
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHML 12.0%, betterVONV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- JHML 1.35VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- JHML −23.5%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JHML 0.97VONV 0.85
JHML and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

