ILCV ranks 2nd and JPUS 25th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs JPUS
ILCV −0.14pt a year
0.04%0.18%
ILCV 3.0×the volume
24.4K8.12K
ILCV +0.4pt
+12.3%+11.9%
ILCV vs JPUS Performance
+81.1%+57.2%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- JPUS 0.18%
- ILCV $1.37B
- JPUS $466M
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- JPUS +19.7%
- ILCV 1.51%
- JPUS 2.00%, better
- ILCV 375
- JPUS 370
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- JPUS 8.12K sh
- ILCV $109.27
- JPUS $142.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | JPUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A77 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A78 |
| Risk | A90Higher | A79 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | D39 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B63 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and JPUS are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
JPUSB
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
JPUS Most US equity funds start from market cap. JPUS starts from a J.P. Morgan index that spreads its bets across value, quality and momentum, and charges roughly half the typical multifactor fee to do it.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
JPUS The fund seeks domestic equity exposure while aiming for better risk-adjusted returns than a market-cap-weighted index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs JPUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs JPUS Cost
Overpaying JPUS vs ILCV
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
JPUS 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | JPUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $328 | $255 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,281 | $993 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,749 | $2,900 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.18%JPUS
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
JPUS 24th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs JPUS Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%
- JPUS 2.00%, better
- ILCV $1.65
- JPUS $2.85
- ILCV $0.42
- JPUS $0.73
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- JPUS Sep 22, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- JPUS Sep 24, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- JPUS Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs JPUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- JPUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterJPUS 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterJPUS 1.11
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterJPUS −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82JPUS 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.