VONV ranks 1st and JPUS 25th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
JPUS vs VONV
VONV −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.06%
VONV 95.2×the volume
8.12K774K
VONV +0.1pt
+11.9%+12.0%
JPUS vs VONV Performance
+57.2%+73.8%
- JPUS 0.18%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- JPUS $466M
- VONV $23.3B
- JPUS +19.7%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- JPUS 2.00%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- JPUS 370
- VONV 873
- JPUS 8.12K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- JPUS $142.33
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPUS | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A79 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B63 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. JPUS and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPUSB
VONVA
In short
JPUS Most US equity funds start from market cap. JPUS starts from a J.P. Morgan index that spreads its bets across value, quality and momentum, and charges roughly half the typical multifactor fee to do it.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
JPUS The fund seeks domestic equity exposure while aiming for better risk-adjusted returns than a market-cap-weighted index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPUS vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPUS vs VONV Cost
Overpaying JPUS vs VONV
$2,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPUS 0.18%
$3,749
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPUS | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $110 | $218 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $432 | $849 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $1,270 | $2,479 |
- 0.18%JPUS
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
JPUS 24th cheapest of 99 funds
JPUS vs VONV Dividends
- JPUS 2.00%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- JPUS $2.85
- VONV $1.74
- JPUS $0.73
- VONV $0.42
- JPUS Sep 22, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- JPUS Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- JPUS Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
JPUS vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JPUS
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPUS 12.1%VONV 12.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- JPUS 1.11VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- JPUS −19.0%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JPUS 0.67VONV 0.85
JPUS and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

