VYM ranks 2nd and JPUS 25th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
JPUS vs VYM
VYM −0.14pt a year
0.18%0.04%
VYM 140.6×the volume
8.12K1.14M
VYM +0.1pt
+11.9%+12.0%
JPUS vs VYM Performance
+57.2%+74.3%
- JPUS 0.18%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- JPUS $466M
- VYM $95.8B
- JPUS +19.7%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- JPUS 2.00%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- JPUS 370
- VYM 601
- JPUS 8.12K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- JPUS $142.33
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPUS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A79Higher |
| Risk | A79 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B63 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. JPUS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPUSB
VYMA
In short
JPUS Most US equity funds start from market cap. JPUS starts from a J.P. Morgan index that spreads its bets across value, quality and momentum, and charges roughly half the typical multifactor fee to do it.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
JPUS The fund seeks domestic equity exposure while aiming for better risk-adjusted returns than a market-cap-weighted index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPUS vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPUS vs VYM Cost
Overpaying JPUS vs VYM
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPUS 0.18%
$3,749
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPUS | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $73 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $288 | $993 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $849 | $2,900 |
- 0.18%JPUS
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
JPUS 24th cheapest of 99 funds
JPUS vs VYM Dividends
- JPUS 2.00%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- JPUS $2.85
- VYM $3.68
- JPUS $0.73
- VYM $0.89
- JPUS Sep 22, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- JPUS Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- JPUS Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
JPUS vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JPUS
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPUS 12.1%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JPUS 1.11VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- JPUS −19.0%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JPUS 0.67VYM 0.75
JPUS and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



