ILCV ranks 2nd and MFUS 32nd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs MFUS
ILCV −0.25pt a year
0.04%0.29%
ILCV 1.9×the volume
24.4K13K
ILCV +0.3pt
+12.6%+12.3%
ILCV vs MFUS Performance
+81.1%+78.3%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- MFUS 0.29%
- ILCV $1.37B
- MFUS $299M
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- MFUS +20.0%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- MFUS 1.41%
- ILCV 375
- MFUS 919
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- MFUS 13K sh
- ILCV $109.27
- MFUS $66.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | MFUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A82 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | A82 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | D39 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | C52 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and MFUS are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
MFUSB
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
MFUS One ticker, four factors. MFUS tracks a RAFI index that blends value, momentum, quality and low volatility across roughly 800 US stocks, so no single style has to carry the load.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
MFUS The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs MFUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs MFUS Cost
Overpaying MFUS vs ILCV
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
MFUS 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | MFUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $527 | $454 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,044 | $1,756 |
| 30 | $849 | $5,952 | $5,103 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.29%MFUS
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
MFUS 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs MFUS Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- MFUS 1.41%
- ILCV $1.65
- MFUS $0.93
- ILCV $0.42
- MFUS $0.24
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- MFUS Oct 1, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- MFUS Oct 5, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- MFUS Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs MFUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- MFUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterMFUS 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterMFUS 1.49
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%MFUS −18.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82MFUS 0.82Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.