VYM ranks 2nd and MFUS 32nd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
MFUS vs VYM
VYM −0.25pt a year
0.29%0.04%
VYM 87.9×the volume
13K1.14M
MFUS +0.5pt
+12.3%+11.8%
MFUS vs VYM Performance
+78.3%+74.3%
- MFUS 0.29%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- MFUS $299M
- VYM $95.8B
- MFUS +20.0%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- MFUS 1.41%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- MFUS 919
- VYM 601
- MFUS 13K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- MFUS $66.65
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MFUS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A82 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C53 |
| Durability | C52 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. MFUS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MFUSB
VYMA
In short
MFUS One ticker, four factors. MFUS tracks a RAFI index that blends value, momentum, quality and low volatility across roughly 800 US stocks, so no single style has to carry the load.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
MFUS The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MFUS vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MFUS vs VYM Cost
Overpaying MFUS vs VYM
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MFUS 0.29%
$5,952
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MFUS | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $73 | $454 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $288 | $1,756 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $849 | $5,103 |
- 0.29%MFUS
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
MFUS 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
MFUS vs VYM Dividends
- MFUS 1.41%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- MFUS $0.93
- VYM $3.68
- MFUS $0.24
- VYM $0.89
- MFUS Oct 1, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- MFUS Oct 5, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- MFUS Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
MFUS vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MFUS
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MFUS 11.6%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MFUS 1.49, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- MFUS −18.2%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MFUS 0.82VYM 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



