ILCV ranks 2nd and OMFL 24th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs OMFL
ILCV −0.25pt a year
0.04%0.29%
OMFL 6.9×the volume
25.1K172K
ILCV +4.1pt
+12.5%+8.4%
ILCV vs OMFL Performance
+79.9%+49.4%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- OMFL 0.29%
- ILCV $1.37B
- OMFL $4.6B
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- OMFL +20.1%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- OMFL 0.82%
- ILCV 374
- OMFL 634
- ILCV 25.1K sh
- OMFL 172K sh, better
- ILCV $108.28
- OMFL $69.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | OMFL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A82 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A91Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | B62 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | D39Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A82Higher | A74 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and OMFL are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
OMFLA
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
OMFL Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) packed into one rules-based Russell 1000 index, for less than the typical multifactor fund charges. The mix is set by the index rulebook, not by a stock picker.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
OMFL The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities using a rules-based approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs OMFL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs OMFL Cost
Overpaying OMFL vs ILCV
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
OMFL 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | OMFL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $527 | $454 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,044 | $1,756 |
| 30 | $849 | $5,952 | $5,103 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.29%OMFL
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
OMFL 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs OMFL Dividends
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- OMFL 0.82%
- ILCV $1.65
- OMFL $0.59
- ILCV $0.42
- OMFL $0.14
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- OMFL Sep 21, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- OMFL Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- OMFL Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs OMFL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- OMFL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterOMFL 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterOMFL 1.03
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterOMFL −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82OMFL 0.88
ILCV and OMFL in the news
Category Review
US multifactor funds ran 30 points apart

Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.