VYM ranks 2nd and OMFL 24th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
OMFL vs VYM
VYM −0.25pt a year
0.29%0.04%
VYM 6.7×the volume
172K1.15M
VYM +2.9pt
+8.4%+11.3%
OMFL vs VYM Performance
+49.4%+70.4%
- OMFL 0.29%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- OMFL $4.6B
- VYM $78.9B
- OMFL +20.1%, better
- VYM +18.9%
- OMFL 0.82%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- OMFL 634
- VYM 610
- OMFL 172K sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- OMFL $69.62
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OMFL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A81 |
| Risk | B58 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D36 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. OMFL and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OMFLA
VYMA
In short
OMFL Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) packed into one rules-based Russell 1000 index, for less than the typical multifactor fund charges. The mix is set by the index rulebook, not by a stock picker.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
OMFL The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities using a rules-based approach.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OMFL vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OMFL vs VYM Cost
Overpaying OMFL vs VYM
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OMFL 0.29%
$5,952
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OMFL | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $73 | $454 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $288 | $1,756 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $849 | $5,103 |
- 0.29%OMFL
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
OMFL 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
OMFL vs VYM Dividends
- OMFL 0.82%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- OMFL $0.59
- VYM $3.68
- OMFL $0.14
- VYM $0.89
- OMFL Sep 21, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- OMFL Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- OMFL Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
OMFL vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OMFL
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OMFL 13.0%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- OMFL 1.03VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- OMFL −22.4%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- OMFL 0.88VYM 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


