VONV ranks 1st and OMFL 24th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
OMFL vs VONV
VONV −0.23pt a year
0.29%0.06%
VONV 4.5×the volume
172K776K
VONV +3.3pt
+8.4%+11.7%
OMFL vs VONV Performance
+49.4%+73.9%
- OMFL 0.29%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- OMFL $4.6B
- VONV $21.7B
- OMFL +20.1%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- OMFL 0.82%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- OMFL 634
- VONV 887
- OMFL 172K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- OMFL $69.62
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OMFL | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B58 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | D36 | C49Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. OMFL and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OMFLA
VONVA
In short
OMFL Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) packed into one rules-based Russell 1000 index, for less than the typical multifactor fund charges. The mix is set by the index rulebook, not by a stock picker.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
OMFL The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities using a rules-based approach.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OMFL vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OMFL vs VONV Cost
Overpaying OMFL vs VONV
$4,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OMFL 0.29%
$5,952
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OMFL | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $110 | $417 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $432 | $1,612 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $1,270 | $4,682 |
- 0.29%OMFL
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
OMFL 43rd cheapest of 99 funds
OMFL vs VONV Dividends
- OMFL 0.82%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- OMFL $0.59
- VONV $1.74
- OMFL $0.14
- VONV $0.42
- OMFL Sep 21, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- OMFL Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- OMFL Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
OMFL vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OMFL
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OMFL 13.0%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- OMFL 1.03VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- OMFL −22.4%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- OMFL 0.88VONV 0.85
OMFL and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

