Skip to content

OMFL vs VONV

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

OMFLACboe

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.23pt a year

OMFL0.29%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 4.5×the volume

OMFL172KVONV776K

5Y return · a year

VONV +3.3pt

OMFL+8.4%VONV+11.7%

OMFL vs VONV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+49.4%OMFL+73.9%VONV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. OMFL +49.4%. VONV +73.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
OMFL 0.29%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
OMFL $4.6B
VONV $21.7B
1Y total return
OMFL +20.1%
VONV +30.6%, better
Yield (12M)
OMFL 0.82%
VONV 1.51%, better
Holdings
OMFL 634
VONV 887
Avg volume (30D)
OMFL 172K sh
VONV 776K sh, better
NAV per share
OMFL $69.62
VONV $112.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

OMFL: Cost 55, Risk 58, Mission 98, Tradability 91, Holdings 36, Durability 74. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 89, Mission 100, Tradability 59, Holdings 49, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for OMFL, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarOMFLVONV
Cost30% weightB55A96Higher
Mission25% weightA98A100Higher
Risk15% weightB58A89Higher
Tradability15% weightA91HigherB59
Holdings10% weightD36C49Higher
Durability5% weightA74A92Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. OMFL and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and OMFL 24th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 24AJPUSJPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Equity ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 24AOMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 27BROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETFScore 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

OMFLAInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

OMFL Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) packed into one rules-based Russell 1000 index, for less than the typical multifactor fund charges. The mix is set by the index rulebook, not by a stock picker.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

OMFL The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities using a rules-based approach.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • OMFL Value, momentum, quality and low volatility in one ticker, pulled from the Russell 1000 and set by index rules rather than a manager's call.
  • 0.29% a year, under the 0.32% median for multifactor peers. A modest toll for a portfolio juggling four factors.
  • Running since 2017 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades with decent regularity, so getting in and out is rarely the hard part.
  • About 600 names, so the tilts arrive spread wide instead of stacked in a handful of stocks. Distributions land quarterly.
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • OMFL Plain large-cap slices cost a fraction: VONV at 0.06%, IUSG at 0.04%. The gap is what the factor machinery costs you.
  • The rulebook runs it. At least 80% of assets sit in index securities, with nobody stepping in when a factor goes cold.
  • A rules-built cut of the Russell 1000, weighted its own way, so its path can separate from plain large-cap exposure in either direction.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full OMFL profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

OMFL vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

OMFL vs VONV Cost

Overpaying OMFL vs VONV

$4,682

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • OMFL 0.29%

    $5,952

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • OMFL 0.29%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530OMFL $5,952VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearOMFLVONVOverpaying
10$527$110$417
20$2,044$432$1,612
30$5,952$1,270$4,682

Expense ratio

  • 0.29%OMFL
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

OMFL 43rd cheapest of 99 funds

OMFL vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
OMFL 0.82%
VONV 1.51%, better
Payout (12M)
OMFL $0.59
VONV $1.74
Last payment
OMFL $0.14
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
OMFL Sep 21, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
OMFL Sep 25, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
OMFL Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

OMFLQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll OMFL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.08; Mar 16, 2018 $0.06; Jun 19, 2018 $0.01; Sep 25, 2018 $0.14; Dec 26, 2018 $0.14; Mar 19, 2019 $0.06; Jun 24, 2019 $0.13; Sep 23, 2019 $0.13; Dec 23, 2019 $0.19; Mar 23, 2020 $0.10; Jun 22, 2020 $0.11; Sep 21, 2020 $0.18; Dec 21, 2020 $0.19; Mar 22, 2021 $0.12; Jun 21, 2021 $0.11; Sep 20, 2021 $0.16; Dec 20, 2021 $0.09; Mar 21, 2022 $0.12; Jun 21, 2022 $0.17; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.20; Mar 20, 2023 $0.21; Jun 20, 2023 $0.17; Sep 18, 2023 $0.21; Dec 18, 2023 $0.12; Mar 18, 2024 $0.25; Jun 24, 2024 $0.23; Sep 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 23, 2024 $0.08; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.11; Sep 22, 2025 $0.11; Dec 22, 2025 $0.16; Mar 23, 2026 $0.15; Jun 22, 2026 $0.15; Sep 21, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

OMFL vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • OMFL
  • VONV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: OMFL −22.4% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
OMFL 13.0%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
OMFL 1.03VONV 1.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
OMFL −22.4%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
OMFL 0.88VONV 0.85

OMFL and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • OMFLAvsILCVA

    Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OMFLAvsVYMA

    Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OMFLAvsDCORA

    Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · U.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsDCORA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · U.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.