ILCV ranks 2nd and RECS 12th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs RECS
ILCV −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
RECS 18.9×the volume
24.4K461K
RECS +0.3pt
+12.6%+12.9%
ILCV vs RECS Performance
+81.1%+83.1%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- RECS 0.15%
- ILCV $1.37B
- RECS $6.22B
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- RECS +10.8%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- RECS 1.01%
- ILCV 375
- RECS 358
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- RECS 461K sh, better
- ILCV $109.27
- RECS $44.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | RECS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A83 |
| Mission | A82 | A93Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | B64 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | D39Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A82Higher | B55 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and RECS are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
RECSA
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
RECS Columbia takes the boring core of a US stock portfolio and runs it through its own value, quality and momentum research screen. Roughly 400 names at 0.15% a year: index-fund pricing on a research-driven build.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
RECS The Fund seeks results corresponding to the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs RECS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs RECS Cost
Overpaying RECS vs ILCV
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
RECS 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | RECS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.15%RECS
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
RECS 13th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs RECS Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- RECS 1.01%
- ILCV $1.65
- RECS $0.45
- ILCV $0.42
- RECS $0.45
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- RECS Dec 18, 2025
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- RECS Dec 26, 2025
- ILCV Quarterly
- RECS Annual
Distribution history
ILCV vs RECS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- RECS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterRECS 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterRECS 1.53
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterRECS −22.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82RECS 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.