VONV ranks 1st and RECS 12th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
RECS vs VONV
VONV −0.09pt a year
0.15%0.06%
VONV 1.7×the volume
461K774K
RECS +1.2pt
+12.9%+11.7%
RECS vs VONV Performance
+83.1%+73.8%
- RECS 0.15%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- RECS $6.22B
- VONV $23.3B
- RECS +10.8%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- RECS 1.01%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- RECS 358
- VONV 873
- RECS 461K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- RECS $44.92
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RECS | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B57 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | D29 | C49Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. RECS and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RECSA
VONVA
In short
RECS Columbia takes the boring core of a US stock portfolio and runs it through its own value, quality and momentum research screen. Roughly 400 names at 0.15% a year: index-fund pricing on a research-driven build.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
RECS The Fund seeks results corresponding to the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index, before fees and expenses.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RECS vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RECS vs VONV Cost
Overpaying RECS vs VONV
$1,867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RECS 0.15%
$3,137
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RECS | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $110 | $164 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $432 | $639 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,270 | $1,867 |
- 0.15%RECS
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
RECS 13th cheapest of 99 funds
RECS vs VONV Dividends
- RECS 1.01%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- RECS $0.45
- VONV $1.74
- RECS $0.45
- VONV $0.42
- RECS Dec 18, 2025
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- RECS Dec 26, 2025
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- RECS Annual
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
RECS vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RECS
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RECS 11.5%, betterVONV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- RECS 1.53, betterVONV 1.43
- Worst fall
- RECS −22.1%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RECS 0.88VONV 0.85
RECS and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

