Skip to content

IMCV vs RECS

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

IMCVANasdaq

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

RECSANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IMCV −0.09pt a year

IMCV0.06%RECS0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

RECS 11.9×the volume

IMCV38.9KRECS461K

5Y return · a year

RECS +1.9pt

IMCV+11.0%RECS+12.9%

IMCV vs RECS Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.3%IMCV+83.1%RECS

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IMCV +68.3%. RECS +83.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCV 0.06%, better
RECS 0.15%
Fund size
IMCV $1.27B
RECS $6.22B
1Y total return
IMCV +27.0%, better
RECS +10.8%
Yield (12M)
IMCV 1.84%, better
RECS 1.01%
Holdings
IMCV 271
RECS 358
Avg volume (30D)
IMCV 38.9K sh
RECS 461K sh, better
NAV per share
IMCV $99.16
RECS $44.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCV: Cost 96, Risk 77, Mission 76, Tradability 69, Holdings 69, Durability 77. RECS: Cost 83, Risk 57, Mission 93, Tradability 92, Holdings 29, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCV, RECS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCVRECS
Cost30% weightA96HigherA83
Mission25% weightA76A93Higher
Risk15% weightA77HigherB57
Tradability15% weightB69A92Higher
Holdings10% weightB69HigherD29
Durability5% weightA77HigherB55

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMCV and RECS are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

IMCV ranks 4th and RECS 12th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5ADCORU.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class SharesScore 79
  6. Rank 11AGSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 77
  7. Rank 12ARECSColumbia Research Enhanced Core ETFScore 76
  8. Rank 12ASMLFiShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETFScore 76

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCVAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

RECSAColumbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

In short

IMCV No data

RECS Columbia takes the boring core of a US stock portfolio and runs it through its own value, quality and momentum research screen. Roughly 400 names at 0.15% a year: index-fund pricing on a research-driven build.

Stated mandate

IMCV No data

RECS The Fund seeks results corresponding to the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

IMCV No data

  • RECS 0.15% a year for a researched screen, well under half the going rate in its multifactor cohort.
  • The value, quality and momentum tilt lives inside a broad book of about 400 US stocks, so it reads as a core position rather than a single-factor bet.
  • Sticks close to its stated Beta Advantage index, and it is a multi-billion-dollar fund with steady daily volume behind the quotes.
  • Running since 2019 and one of the stronger implementations in a crowded US multifactor field.

Worth knowing

IMCV No data

  • RECS Plain-vanilla rivals such as VYM and IUSG charge a fraction as much. The extra basis points here buy the research screen, not broader coverage.
  • The screen trims rather than reinvents: the portfolio still leans on the same large US names that dominate the broad market, so the tilt shows up slowly.
  • Distributions come once or twice a year, not quarterly, so the cash arrives on a lumpy schedule.

Full IMCV profile⁠

Full RECS profile⁠

IMCV vs RECS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCV vs RECS Cost

Overpaying RECS vs IMCV

$1,867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMCV 0.06%

    $1,270

  • RECS 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMCV 0.06%
  • RECS 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530RECS $3,137IMCV $1,270

Year by year

YearIMCVRECSOverpaying
10$110$274$164
20$432$1,071$639
30$1,270$3,137$1,867

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%IMCV, cheaper
  • 0.15%RECS
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

IMCV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

RECS 13th cheapest of 99 funds

IMCV vs RECS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCV 1.84%, better
RECS 1.01%
Payout (12M)
IMCV $1.83
RECS $0.45
Last payment
IMCV $0.52
RECS $0.45
Ex-dividend
IMCV Sep 15, 2026
RECS Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
IMCV Sep 18, 2026
RECS Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
IMCV Quarterly
RECS Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.22; Jun 27, 2017 $0.24; Sep 26, 2017 $0.26; Dec 19, 2017 $0.27; Mar 22, 2018 $0.27; Jun 26, 2018 $0.27; Sep 26, 2018 $0.31; Dec 17, 2018 $0.35; Mar 20, 2019 $0.30; Jun 17, 2019 $0.33; Sep 24, 2019 $0.34; Dec 16, 2019 $0.41; Mar 25, 2020 $0.49; Jun 15, 2020 $0.27; Sep 23, 2020 $0.33; Dec 14, 2020 $0.27; Mar 25, 2021 $0.31; Jun 10, 2021 $0.24; Sep 24, 2021 $0.36; Dec 13, 2021 $0.36; Mar 24, 2022 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.27; Sep 26, 2022 $0.42; Dec 13, 2022 $0.44; Mar 23, 2023 $0.37; Jun 7, 2023 $0.28; Sep 26, 2023 $0.44; Dec 20, 2023 $0.47; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 11, 2024 $0.37; Sep 25, 2024 $0.55; Dec 17, 2024 $0.52; Mar 18, 2025 $0.44; Jun 16, 2025 $0.44; Sep 16, 2025 $0.42; Dec 16, 2025 $0.54; Mar 17, 2026 $0.35; Jun 15, 2026 $0.42; Sep 15, 2026 $0.52. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
RECSAnnual · 7 paymentsAll RECS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 18, 2020 $0.27; Dec 20, 2021 $5.56; Dec 19, 2022 $0.32; Dec 18, 2023 $0.28; Dec 18, 2024 $0.38; Dec 18, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

IMCV vs RECS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IMCV
  • RECS
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RECS −22.1% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCV 13.6%RECS 11.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCV 1.22RECS 1.53, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCV −19.9%, betterRECS −22.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMCV 0.88RECS 0.88Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • IMCVAvsVONVA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RECSAvsVONVA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCVAvsILCVA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RECSAvsILCVA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCVAvsVYMA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RECSAvsVYMA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.