Skip to content

IMCG vs SPYG

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

SPYGANYSE Arca

Overlap

6.8%by weight

Expense ratio

SPYG −0.02pt a year

IMCG0.06%SPYG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SPYG 18.3×the volume

IMCG127KSPYG2.33M

10Y return · a year

SPYG +3.6pt

IMCG+14.2%SPYG+17.8%

IMCG vs SPYG Performance

Oct 15, 2021 – Oct 16, 2026

+35.6%IMCG+88.0%SPYG

Oct 15, 2021 to Oct 16, 2026. IMCG +35.6%. SPYG +88.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCG 0.06%
SPYG 0.04%, better
Fund size
IMCG $4.08B
SPYG $56.7B
1Y total return
IMCG +15.5%
SPYG +16.6%, better
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.66%, better
SPYG 0.49%
Holdings
IMCG 262
SPYG 154
Avg volume (30D)
IMCG 127K sh
SPYG 2.33M sh, better
NAV per share
IMCG $94.99
SPYG $122.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCG: Cost 79, Risk 64, Mission 95, Tradability 58, Holdings 77, Durability 66. SPYG: Cost 96, Risk 58, Mission 98, Tradability 93, Holdings 37, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCG, SPYG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCGSPYG
Cost30% weightA79A96Higher
Mission25% weightA95A98Higher
Risk15% weightB64HigherB58
Tradability15% weightB58A93Higher
Holdings10% weightA77HigherD37
Durability5% weightB66A79Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMCG and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

SPYG ranks 1st and IMCG 5th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 4AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 5AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 6AVBKVanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETFScore 71

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

SPYGAState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

In short

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.

Stated mandate

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.

Why people hold it

  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.
  • SPYG Costs 0.04% a year, well under the typical fee in the US growth-ETF group.
  • The cheapest way to buy the S&P 500 Growth Index: VOOG follows the same benchmark at 0.07%.
  • Has tracked its index tightly, one of the strongest implementations among growth funds we grade.
  • Trading since 2000, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively, so spreads stay thin. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.
  • SPYG About 150 stocks, not 500. You get the growth slice, which means heavier single-name and sector concentration than the full index.
  • The index screens on growth and momentum, so rebalances lean into names that have already run and the ride is bumpier than the broad market.
  • Large-cap US only. No small caps, no international, no bonds.

Full IMCG profile⁠

Full SPYG profile⁠

IMCG vs SPYG Holdings

Overlap

6.8%by weight

Only IMCG
192
of 262
In both
70
holdings
Only SPYG
84
of 154

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingIMCGSPYG
NVDANVIDIA CorpNot held14.31%
MSFTMicrosoft CorpNot held10.90%
AAPLApple IncNot held6.79%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class ANot held5.58%
GOOGAlphabet Inc Class CNot held4.46%
AVGOBroadcom IncNot held4.46%
METAMeta Platforms Inc Class ANot held4.42%
AMZNAmazon.com IncNot held3.61%
MUMicron Technology IncNot held2.86%
LLYEli Lilly & CoNot held2.73%

All 259 IMCG holdings⁠All 152 SPYG holdings⁠

Sectors

IMCGSPYG

  • Information TechnologyIMCG 25.3%SPYG —
  • IndustrialsIMCG 23.1%SPYG 5.3%
  • FinancialsIMCG 12.0%SPYG 8.5%
  • Consumer DiscretionaryIMCG 10.2%SPYG 7.8%
  • Health CareIMCG 8.4%SPYG 6.1%
  • MaterialsIMCG 6.2%SPYG 0.5%
  • EnergyIMCG 3.4%SPYG 0.1%
  • Real EstateIMCG 3.4%SPYG 0.6%
  • UtilitiesIMCG 3.1%SPYG 0.4%
  • Consumer StaplesIMCG 2.7%SPYG 1.0%
  • CommunicationIMCG 2.2%SPYG 15.5%
  • TechnologyIMCG —SPYG 54.3%

IMCG vs SPYG Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%IMCG
  • 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

IMCG 8th cheapest of 35 funds

$421less in fees with SPYG over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$250$500$750$1,000$1,250$1,500Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

IMCG vs SPYG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 16, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.66%, better
SPYG 0.49%
Payout (12M)
IMCG $0.62
SPYG $0.59
Last payment
IMCG $0.19
SPYG $0.15
Ex-dividend
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
SPYG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
SPYG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
IMCG Quarterly
SPYG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
SPYGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SPYG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 19, 2018 $0.10; Jun 18, 2018 $0.12; Sep 24, 2018 $0.14; Dec 24, 2018 $0.14; Mar 18, 2019 $0.12; Jun 24, 2019 $0.15; Sep 23, 2019 $0.14; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Mar 23, 2020 $0.14; Jun 22, 2020 $0.12; Sep 21, 2020 $0.10; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Mar 22, 2021 $0.11; Jun 21, 2021 $0.11; Sep 20, 2021 $0.11; Dec 20, 2021 $0.12; Mar 21, 2022 $0.11; Jun 21, 2022 $0.13; Sep 19, 2022 $0.13; Dec 19, 2022 $0.14; Mar 20, 2023 $0.18; Jun 20, 2023 $0.19; Sep 18, 2023 $0.18; Dec 18, 2023 $0.20; Mar 18, 2024 $0.11; Jun 24, 2024 $0.12; Sep 23, 2024 $0.13; Dec 23, 2024 $0.17; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.14; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.16; Mar 23, 2026 $0.13; Jun 22, 2026 $0.15; Sep 21, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

IMCG vs SPYG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IMCG
  • SPYG
Oct 15, 2021 to Oct 16, 2026. Worst fall: IMCG −35.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCG 17.0%SPYG 16.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCG 0.84SPYG 1.37, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCG −35.1%SPYG −32.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
IMCG 1.14SPYG 1.18

IMCG and SPYG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYGAvsSCHGA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsVUGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYGAvsVUGA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsILCGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYGAvsILCGA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.