IMCG ranks 2nd and VOT 7th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs VOT
VOT −0.01pt a year
0.06%0.05%
VOT 1.5×the volume
132K204K
IMCG +2.7pt
+14.3%+11.6%
IMCG vs VOT Performance
+30.8%+15.5%
- IMCG 0.06%
- VOT 0.05%, better
- IMCG $4.04B
- VOT $33.2B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- VOT −1.2%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- VOT 0.62%
- IMCG 262
- VOT 123
- IMCG 132K sh
- VOT 204K sh, better
- IMCG $93.24
- VOT $286.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A95 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | A72 |
| Durability | B66 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and VOT are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
VOTA
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
VOT Mid-caps are the market's forgotten middle: too big for small-cap funds, too small for the S&P 500. VOT buys the growth half of that gap for five basis points, a fraction of what the typical factor fund charges.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
VOT The ETF is designed to follow the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, a passive benchmark for U.S. mid-capitalization growth companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs VOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs VOT Cost
Overpaying IMCG vs VOT
$210
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
VOT 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | VOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $92 | $18 |
| 20 | $432 | $360 | $72 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $1,060 | $210 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.05%VOT, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VOT 5th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs VOT Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- VOT 0.62%
- IMCG $0.62
- VOT $1.78
- IMCG $0.19
- VOT $0.39
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- VOT Sep 28, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- VOT Sep 30, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- VOT Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs VOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- VOT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterVOT 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97, betterVOT 0.75
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%, betterVOT −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14VOT 1.16
IMCG and VOT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

