SCHG ranks 2nd and IMCG 5th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs SCHG
9.2%by weight
SCHG −0.02pt a year
0.06%0.04%
SCHG 60.9×the volume
127K7.76M
SCHG +4.5pt
+14.2%+18.7%
IMCG vs SCHG Performance
+35.6%+87.0%
- IMCG 0.06%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- IMCG $4.08B
- SCHG $64.3B
- IMCG +15.5%, better
- SCHG +11.4%
- IMCG 0.66%, better
- SCHG 0.39%
- IMCG 262
- SCHG 187
- IMCG 127K sh
- SCHG 7.76M sh, better
- IMCG $94.99
- SCHG $35.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A92 |
| Risk | B64Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | B58 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B66 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
SCHGA
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs SCHG Holdings
Overlap
9.2%
- 176
- 86
- 101
Holdings side by side
| Holding | IMCG | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | Not held | 12.05% |
| AAPL | Not held | 11.44% |
| MSFT | Not held | 9.18% |
| AMZN | Not held | 5.73% |
| GOOGL | Not held | 4.70% |
| META | Not held | 4.32% |
| AVGO | Not held | 4.11% |
| GOOG | Not held | 3.76% |
| MU | Not held | 2.80% |
| TSLA | Not held | 2.72% |
Sectors
IMCGSCHG
- Information TechnologyIMCG 25.3%SCHG —
- IndustrialsIMCG 23.1%SCHG 7.0%
- FinancialsIMCG 12.0%SCHG 5.0%
- Consumer DiscretionaryIMCG 10.2%SCHG 10.1%
- Health CareIMCG 8.4%SCHG 6.6%
- MaterialsIMCG 6.2%SCHG 0.9%
- EnergyIMCG 3.4%SCHG 0.7%
- Real EstateIMCG 3.4%SCHG 0.3%
- UtilitiesIMCG 3.1%SCHG 0.4%
- Consumer StaplesIMCG 2.7%SCHG 1.1%
- CommunicationIMCG 2.2%SCHG 13.7%
- TechnologyIMCG —SCHG 54.3%
IMCG vs SCHG Cost
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG 8th cheapest of 35 funds
$421
IMCG vs SCHG Dividends
- IMCG 0.66%, better
- SCHG 0.39%
- IMCG $0.62
- SCHG $0.14
- IMCG $0.19
- SCHG $0.04
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- SCHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 17.0%SCHG 16.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.84SCHG 1.25, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%SCHG −34.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14SCHG 1.20
IMCG and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

