INCE ranks 4th and RAAX 12th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
INCE vs RAAX
INCE −0.26pt a year
0.29%0.55%
RAAX 6.1×the volume
47.6K289K
RAAX +0.5pt
+10.2%+10.7%
INCE vs RAAX Performance
+62.5%+66.6%
- INCE 0.29%, better
- RAAX 0.55%
- INCE $360M
- RAAX $1.38B
- INCE +22.4%, better
- RAAX +15.4%
- INCE 5.01%, better
- RAAX 2.10%
- INCE 116
- RAAX 199
- INCE 47.6K sh
- RAAX 289K sh, better
- INCE $67.35
- RAAX $38.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INCE | RAAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | C53 |
| Mission | B68 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | B64 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A85 | A88Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. INCE and RAAX are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INCEA
RAAXB
In short
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
RAAX One ticker for the stuff you can touch: commodities, resource stocks, REITs, pipelines, MLPs and gold, bundled through other ETFs and actively re-mixed with an eye on sustained drawdowns. VanEck has run it since 2018.
Stated mandate
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
RAAX The Fund seeks long-term total return, aiming to maximize real returns while reducing downside risk during sustained declines. It primarily uses exchange-traded products for exposure to commodities, natural-resource equities, REITs, infrastructure, MLPs, and gold, including gold-mining equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INCE vs RAAX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INCE vs RAAX Cost
Overpaying RAAX vs INCE
$4,952
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
RAAX 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INCE | RAAX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $988 | $461 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $3,790 | $1,746 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $10,904 | $4,952 |
- 0.29%INCE, cheaper
- 0.55%RAAX
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
INCE 6th cheapest of 36 funds
RAAX 16th cheapest of 36 funds
INCE vs RAAX Dividends
- INCE 5.01%, better
- RAAX 2.10%
- INCE $3.42
- RAAX $0.82
- INCE $0.30
- RAAX $0.82
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- RAAX Dec 29, 2025
- INCE Nov 4, 2026
- RAAX Dec 31, 2025
- INCE Monthly
- RAAX Annual
Distribution history
INCE vs RAAX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INCE
- RAAX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INCE 10.8%, betterRAAX 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- INCE 1.28, betterRAAX 1.25
- Worst fall
- INCE −18.4%, betterRAAX −23.5%
- Market sensitivity
- INCE 0.60RAAX 0.65
INCE and RAAX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
