UNHG ranks 2nd and INFH 270th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
INFH vs UNHG
UNHG −0.54pt a year
1.31%0.77%
UNHG 2.9×the volume
252K726K
INFH vs UNHG Performance
−37.2%−8.1%
- INFH 1.31%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- INFH $3M
- UNHG $63M
- INFH
- UNHG +11.9%
- INFH 7
- UNHG 5
- INFH 252K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- INFH $3.27
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INFH | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | D29 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. INFH and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INFHD
UNHGA
In short
INFH Infleqtion is the first neutral-atom quantum company to trade publicly. INFH is the first fund built to double it, aiming for 200% of INFQ's daily move, reset every day. A trading tool, not a buy-and-hold quantum bet.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
INFH The fund seeks to provide 200% of the daily performance of INFQ, for tactical bullish exposure to quantum-technology innovation and related developments.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INFH vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INFH vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying INFH vs UNHG
$8,690
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INFH 1.31%
$23,519
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INFH | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,371 | $909 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $5,205 | $3,245 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $14,829 | $8,690 |
- 1.31%INFH
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
INFH 236th cheapest of 315 funds
INFH vs UNHG Dividends
- INFH None
- UNHG
- INFH
- UNHG $1.90
- INFH
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- INFH
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- INFH
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
INFH vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INFH UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- INFH UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- INFH UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- INFH 0.00UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.