PANG ranks 3rd and INFH 270th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
INFH vs PANG
PANG −0.55pt a year
1.31%0.76%
INFH 5.6×the volume
252K44.6K
INFH vs PANG Performance
−37.2%+7.0%
- INFH 1.31%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- INFH $3M
- PANG $9M
- INFH
- PANG +91.6%
- INFH 7
- PANG 4
- INFH 252K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- INFH $3.27
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INFH | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D29 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. INFH and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INFHD
PANGA
In short
INFH Infleqtion is the first neutral-atom quantum company to trade publicly. INFH is the first fund built to double it, aiming for 200% of INFQ's daily move, reset every day. A trading tool, not a buy-and-hold quantum bet.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
INFH The fund seeks to provide 200% of the daily performance of INFQ, for tactical bullish exposure to quantum-technology innovation and related developments.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INFH vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INFH vs PANG Cost
Overpaying INFH vs PANG
$8,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INFH 1.31%
$23,519
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INFH | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,353 | $927 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $5,142 | $3,308 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $14,656 | $8,863 |
- 1.31%INFH
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
INFH 236th cheapest of 315 funds
INFH vs PANG Dividends
- INFH None
- PANG
- INFH
- PANG $1.30
- INFH
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- INFH
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- INFH
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
INFH vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INFH PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- INFH PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- INFH PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- INFH 0.00PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.