TSMG ranks 1st and INFH 270th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
INFH vs TSMG
TSMG −0.55pt a year
1.31%0.76%
INFH 3.6×the volume
252K69K
INFH vs TSMG Performance
−37.2%−4.6%
- INFH 1.31%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- INFH $3M
- TSMG $28M
- INFH
- TSMG +40.8%
- INFH 7
- TSMG 5
- INFH 252K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- INFH $3.27
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INFH | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | D29 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. INFH and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INFHD
TSMGA
In short
INFH Infleqtion is the first neutral-atom quantum company to trade publicly. INFH is the first fund built to double it, aiming for 200% of INFQ's daily move, reset every day. A trading tool, not a buy-and-hold quantum bet.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
INFH The fund seeks to provide 200% of the daily performance of INFQ, for tactical bullish exposure to quantum-technology innovation and related developments.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INFH vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INFH vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying INFH vs TSMG
$8,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INFH 1.31%
$23,519
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INFH | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,353 | $927 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $5,142 | $3,308 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $14,656 | $8,863 |
- 1.31%INFH
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
INFH 236th cheapest of 315 funds
INFH vs TSMG Dividends
- INFH None
- TSMG
- INFH
- TSMG $2.73
- INFH
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- INFH
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- INFH
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
INFH vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INFH TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- INFH TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- INFH TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- INFH 0.00TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.