SCYB ranks 1st and IQHI 58th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
IQHI vs SCYB
SCYB −0.38pt a year
0.41%0.03%
SCYB 185.5×the volume
5.95K1.1M
SCYB +0.1pt
+8.3%+8.4%
IQHI vs SCYB Performance
+2.3%+2.0%
- IQHI 0.41%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- IQHI $109M
- SCYB $2.8B
- IQHI +2.3%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- IQHI 8.22%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- IQHI 365
- SCYB 1844
- IQHI 5.95K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- IQHI $25.00
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IQHI | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A100Higher |
| Mission | C49 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B62Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | D32 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A99Higher |
| Durability | D32 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. IQHI and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IQHIC
SCYBA
In short
IQHI Born as an ESG high yield fund, IQHI dropped the screen in 2025 and now chases one thing: current income. MacKay Shields' credit team roams junk bonds, loans and convertibles, and the fund pays monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
IQHI The Fund seeks to maximize current income.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IQHI vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IQHI vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying IQHI vs SCYB
$7,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IQHI 0.41%
$8,281
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IQHI | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $741 | $55 | $686 |
| 20 | $2,860 | $216 | $2,644 |
| 30 | $8,281 | $638 | $7,643 |
- 0.41%IQHI
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
IQHI 42nd cheapest of 84 funds
IQHI vs SCYB Dividends
- IQHI 8.22%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- IQHI $2.06
- SCYB $1.80
- IQHI $0.14
- SCYB $0.16
- IQHI Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- IQHI Pays Nov 3, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- IQHI Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
IQHI vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IQHI 4.4%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IQHI 0.84, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- IQHI −4.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IQHI 0.64SCYB 0.28
IQHI and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.41% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
