IQSZ ranks 2nd and PCLN 8th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
IQSZ vs PCLN
IQSZ −0.51pt a year
0.19%0.70%
PCLN 1.6×the volume
1.5K2.35K
IQSZ vs PCLN Performance
+16.2%+13.6%
- IQSZ 0.19%, better
- PCLN 0.70%
- IQSZ $169M
- PCLN $15M
- IQSZ +16.2%, better
- PCLN +13.6%
- IQSZ 1.93%
- PCLN
- IQSZ 472
- PCLN 64
- IQSZ 1.5K sh
- PCLN 2.35K sh, better
- IQSZ $31.37
- PCLN $29.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IQSZ | PCLN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A75Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | D31 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B65Higher | D35 |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. IQSZ and PCLN are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IQSZB
PCLND
In short
IQSZ Active net-zero investing priced like an index fund: 0.19% for a global, roughly 500-stock portfolio where a quant process weighs momentum, quality and value alongside a company's emissions plans.
PCLN An actively managed global stock fund hunting companies that drive the shift to a cleaner economy, measured against MSCI ACWI. In a corner of the market run by cheap rules-based screens, this one pays humans to pick.
Stated mandate
IQSZ Seeks long-term total return. It actively invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies judged to support the transition to a net-zero economy through current or planned greenhouse-gas reductions, primarily among large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets.
PCLN The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio focused on companies contributing to the transition toward a more sustainable economy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IQSZ vs PCLN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IQSZ vs PCLN Cost
Overpaying PCLN vs IQSZ
$9,654
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IQSZ 0.19%
$3,952
PCLN 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IQSZ | PCLN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,250 | $903 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $4,760 | $3,409 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $13,606 | $9,654 |
- 0.19%IQSZ, cheaper
- 0.70%PCLN
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
IQSZ 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
PCLN 7th cheapest of 8 funds
IQSZ vs PCLN Dividends
- IQSZ 1.93%
- PCLN
- IQSZ $0.60
- PCLN
- IQSZ $0.13
- PCLN $0.02
- IQSZ Sep 21, 2026
- PCLN Dec 19, 2025
- IQSZ Sep 25, 2026
- PCLN Dec 23, 2025
- IQSZ Quarterly
- PCLN Irregular
Distribution history
IQSZ vs PCLN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IQSZ 11.5%PCLN 24.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IQSZ 1.41PCLN 0.48
- Worst fall
- IQSZ −9.1%PCLN −14.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IQSZ 0.90PCLN 1.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.