Skip to content

CCSO vs PCLN

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

CCSOBNasdaq

Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF

PCLNDNYSE Arca

Overlap

8.6%by weight

Expense ratio

CCSO −0.35pt a year

CCSO0.35%PCLN0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

CCSO 1.1×the volume

CCSO2.5KPCLN2.35K

CCSO vs PCLN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.7%CCSO+13.6%PCLN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CCSO −5.7%. PCLN +13.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CCSO 0.35%, better
PCLN 0.70%
Fund size
CCSO $45M
PCLN $15M
1Y total return
CCSO −5.7%
PCLN +13.6%, better
Yield (12M)
CCSO 0.64%
PCLN No data
Holdings
CCSO 124
PCLN 64
Avg volume (30D)
CCSO 2.5K sh, better
PCLN 2.35K sh
NAV per share
CCSO $24.79
PCLN $29.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CCSO: Cost 71, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 35, Durability 49. PCLN: Cost 21, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 49, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for CCSO, PCLN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCCSOPCLN
Cost30% weightA71HigherF21
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46HigherC41
Tradability15% weightB68HigherC49
Holdings10% weightD35C49Higher
Durability5% weightC49HigherD35

Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CCSO and PCLN are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Climate & Sustainability⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

CCSO ranks 3rd and PCLN 8th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.

  1. Rank 1AKLMTInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BIQSZInvesco Global Equity Net Zero ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 3BCCSOCarbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 4BSDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 7DRCGERockCreek Global Equality ETFScore 37
  6. Rank 8DPCLNPictet Cleaner Planet ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CCSOBCarbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

PCLNDPictet Cleaner Planet ETF

In short

CCSO The name is the mandate: US-listed companies working on climate-change solutions, in a plain 1940 Act wrapper priced well under the typical US thematic fund.

PCLN An actively managed global stock fund hunting companies that drive the shift to a cleaner economy, measured against MSCI ACWI. In a corner of the market run by cheap rules-based screens, this one pays humans to pick.

Stated mandate

CCSO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through investments primarily in U.S.-listed equity securities of companies focused on climate-change solutions.

PCLN The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio focused on companies contributing to the transition toward a more sustainable economy.

Why people hold it

  • CCSO Costs 0.35% a year, versus a 0.57% median across its US thematic peer group. Cheap is rare in theme funds.
  • The prospectus keeps it tight: long-term capital appreciation from US-listed equities of companies focused on climate-change solutions. No commodity sleeves, no offshore detours.
  • Ordinary open-end fund structure under the 1940 Act. No leverage, no derivatives contract to decode, no K-1 at tax time.
  • Lands in the upper half of its US thematic cohort on our review, which is a crowded field of pricier, narrower ideas.
  • PCLN A real active mandate, not a screen: managers pick global companies tied to the sustainable-economy transition and are measured against the MSCI ACWI net total return index.
  • The portfolio itself is the sturdiest part of the package, with holdings quality rating above the middle of its global thematic peer group.
  • Simple plumbing underneath: a standard 1940 Act equity ETF with no structural quirks flagged in its filings.

Worth knowing

  • CCSO Small asset base and thin trading. Spreads can widen and large orders move the price, so execution matters more here than in a household-name fund.
  • One theme, one country. A climate-solutions basket can drift a long way from the broad US market in either direction.
  • Cheaper thematic options exist: LRND runs at 0.14% and TECB at 0.30%, though they chase different ideas entirely.
  • PCLN At 0.70% a year it prices above the typical global thematic fund, and well above index rivals like KLMT at 0.10% and IQSZ at 0.19%. Stock picking is what the extra buys.
  • Small and thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider and less predictably than in the category's heavyweights.
  • Launched in 2025, so there is little track record to judge the manager on, and its risk profile rests on a short window of data.

Full CCSO profile⁠

Full PCLN profile⁠

CCSO vs PCLN Holdings

How CCSO and PCLN differ

Overlap by weight

8.6%

Shared holdings make up 27.5% of CCSO and 8.6% of PCLN.

Level by level

  • Holdings7 in both8.6%
  • Countryby domicile67.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for PCLN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CCSO and PCLN, widest gap first
CountryMore in CCSOMore in PCLN
United StatesCCSO +18.6 points
NetherlandsPCLN +6.7 points
CanadaCCSO +6.1 points
GermanyPCLN +5.9 points
TaiwanPCLN +4.2 points
FrancePCLN +3.8 points
ChinaCCSO +3.4 points
JapanPCLN +3.3 points
Other countries (10)PCLN +4.1 points

Outside the US: PCLN 81% developed, 19% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CCSO50.8%
  • PCLN40.5%

Securities held

  • CCSO123
  • PCLN64

Asset class

CCSO
Equity
PCLN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CCSO116
  • In both7
  • Only in PCLN57

Only in CCSO

116 securities, 72.0% of CCSO by weight

  • Nucor Corp6.29%
  • Johnson Controls International plc6.02%
  • Southern Copper Corp5.75%

Only in PCLN

57 securities, 91.4% of PCLN by weight

  • Asml Holding NV5.07%
  • Trane Technologies PLC4.37%
  • Broadcom Inc4.27%

Weight gaps

All 7 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CCSO and PCLN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CCSOMore in PCLN
Waste Management IncWMCCSO +4.87 points
Republic Services IncRSGCCSO +4.38 points
Carrier Global CorpCARRCCSO +3.29 points
Quanta Services IncPWRCCSO +3.25 points
GFL Environmental IncGFLCCSO +1.23 points
Xylem Inc/NYXYLCCSO +1.18 points
First Solar IncFSLRCCSO +0.67 points

All CCSO holdings⁠All 55 PCLN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CCSO vs PCLN Cost

Overpaying PCLN vs CCSO

$6,480

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CCSO 0.35%

    $7,126

  • PCLN 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CCSO 0.35%
  • PCLN 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PCLN $13,606CCSO $7,126

Year by year

YearCCSOPCLNOverpaying
10$634$1,250$616
20$2,454$4,760$2,306
30$7,126$13,606$6,480

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CCSO, cheaper
  • 0.70%PCLN
  • Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
  • Median 0.48%

CCSO 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

PCLN 7th cheapest of 8 funds

CCSO vs PCLN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CCSO 0.64%
PCLN No data
Payout (12M)
CCSO $0.16
PCLN No data
Last payment
CCSO $0.16
PCLN $0.02
Ex-dividend
CCSO Dec 29, 2025
PCLN Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
CCSO Dec 30, 2025
PCLN Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
CCSO Annual
PCLN Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CCSOAnnual · 4 paymentsAll CCSO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2022 $0.04; Dec 26, 2023 $0.16; Dec 27, 2024 $0.11; Dec 29, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
PCLNIrregular · 1 paymentAll PCLN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

CCSO vs PCLN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CCSO 20.1%PCLN 24.5%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CCSO 0.56PCLN 0.48since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CCSO −23.7%since Sep 2022PCLN −14.6%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CCSO 1.30PCLN 1.32

Popular comparisons

  • CCSOBvsKLMTA

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCLNDvsKLMTA

    Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCSOBvsIQSZB

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCLNDvsIQSZB

    Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF · Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCSOBvsSDGB

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCLNDvsSDGB

    Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF · iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.