IRTR ranks 3rd and LCO 35th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
IRTR vs LCO
IRTR −1.05pt a year
0.08%1.13%
IRTR 43.0×the volume
12.7K296
IRTR vs LCO Performance
0.0%−2.2%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- LCO 1.13%
- IRTR $60M
- LCO $53M
- IRTR +5.1%
- LCO
- IRTR 3.17%
- LCO
- IRTR 29140
- LCO 87
- IRTR 12.7K sh, better
- LCO 296 sh
- IRTR $31.52
- LCO $25.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRTR | LCO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A82Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A80 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | F21 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. IRTR and LCO are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRTRA
LCOD
In short
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
LCO Most allocation ETFs follow a recipe. LCO hands a manager the whole menu (US, foreign and emerging stocks, preferreds, bonds, cash) to buy what the crowd has walked away from. Launched in 2026 and priced like the active fund it is.
Stated mandate
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
LCO The Fund seeks total return through capital appreciation and income. It actively invests across domestic and foreign equities, preferred stocks, fixed-income securities, cash equivalents, and other investment companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRTR vs LCO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRTR vs LCO Cost
Overpaying LCO vs IRTR
$19,075
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
LCO 1.13%
$20,764
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRTR | LCO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $1,981 | $1,834 |
| 20 | $575 | $7,403 | $6,828 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $20,764 | $19,075 |
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- 1.13%LCO
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
LCO 34th cheapest of 37 funds
IRTR vs LCO Dividends
- IRTR 3.17%
- LCO
- IRTR $1.00
- LCO None
- IRTR $0.08
- LCO
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- LCO
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- LCO
- IRTR Monthly
- LCO
Distribution history
IRTR vs LCO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRTR 7.3%LCO
- Return per unit of risk
- IRTR 1.14LCO
- Worst fall
- IRTR −6.3%LCO
- Market sensitivity
- IRTR 0.47LCO 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.