ITA ranks 2nd and MISL 9th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.
ITA vs MISL
ITA −0.23pt a year
0.37%0.60%
ITA 8.2×the volume
747K91.5K
ITA +2.0pt
+24.9%+22.9%
ITA vs MISL Performance
−2.6%−3.5%
- ITA 0.37%, better
- MISL 0.60%
- ITA $12.2B
- MISL $673M
- ITA −2.6%, better
- MISL −3.5%
- ITA 0.27%, better
- MISL 0.07%
- ITA 52
- MISL 45
- ITA 747K sh, better
- MISL 91.5K sh
- ITA $209.66
- MISL $41.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ITA | MISL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | D34 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | A84 |
| Holdings | D34 | B55Higher |
| Durability | A98Higher | A84 |
Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds
Same Category. ITA and MISL are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ITAA
MISLC
In short
ITA The 2006 original in aerospace and defense, and still the anchor fund of the category. It follows a market-cap-weighted index of U.S. aircraft, parts and weapons makers, so the big primes carry most of the weight.
MISL First Trust's aerospace-and-defense sleeve: roughly 50 US-listed names tracking the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index. A 2022 arrival in a crowded aisle, priced a notch above the category median.
Stated mandate
ITA The fund is designed to follow an index of U.S. equity companies focused on aerospace and defense.
MISL The Fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the price and yield of the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in the stocks comprising that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ITA vs MISL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ITA vs MISL Cost
Overpaying MISL vs ITA
$4,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ITA 0.37%
$7,513
MISL 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ITA | MISL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $1,076 | $406 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $4,116 | $1,526 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $11,817 | $4,304 |
- 0.37%ITA, cheaper
- 0.60%MISL
- Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
- Median 0.50%
ITA 5th cheapest of 25 funds
MISL 16th cheapest of 25 funds
ITA vs MISL Dividends
- ITA 0.27%, better
- MISL 0.07%
- ITA $0.57
- MISL $0.03
- ITA $0.25
- MISL $0.03
- ITA Sep 15, 2026
- MISL Mar 26, 2026
- ITA Sep 18, 2026
- MISL Mar 31, 2026
- ITA Quarterly
- MISL Twice a year
Distribution history
ITA vs MISL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ITA 18.5%, betterMISL 18.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ITA 1.06, betterMISL 0.97
- Worst fall
- ITA −20.0%MISL −20.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- ITA 0.98MISL 0.90
ITA and MISL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





